Becoming an Open Dialogue practitioner: a qualitative study of practitioners’ training experiences and transitioning to practice

The one-year Open Dialogue foundation training was a transformative experience for participants due to its emphasis on self-work and its impact on a personal level. Practitioners felt adequately prepared by their training for dialogic practice, yet becoming an OD practitioner was seen as a continual process extending beyond formal training, necessitating ongoing engagement with the approach and organisational support. However, the commitment of participants to deliver optimal dialogic care was occasionally impeded by organisational constraints, resource limitations, and often having to concurrently deliver conventional care alongside Open Dialogue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1432327
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Becoming an Open Dialogue practitioner: a qualitative study of practitioners’ training experiences and transitioning to practice

Tim D. Weaver, Claire Melia, Eleftherios Anestis, Katherine Clarke et al.
3 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
2.55
article

Becoming an Open Dialogue practitioner: a qualitative study of practitioners’ training experiences and transitioning to practice

Tim D. Weaver, Claire Melia, Eleftherios Anestis, Katherine Clarke, Steve Pilling
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The one-year Open Dialogue foundation training was a transformative experience for participants due to its emphasis on self-work and its impact on a personal level. Practitioners felt adequately prepared by their training for dialogic practice, yet becoming an OD practitioner was seen as a continual process extending beyond formal training, necessitating ongoing engagement with the approach and organisational support. However, the commitment of participants to deliver optimal dialogic care was occasionally impeded by organisational constraints, resource limitations, and often having to concurrently deliver conventional care alongside Open Dialogue.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 15
Civil Service (GB), University College London (GB), Middlesex University London (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Programme Grants for Applied Research
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.