Becoming an Open Dialogue practitioner: a qualitative study of practitioners’ training experiences and transitioning to practice
The one-year Open Dialogue foundation training was a transformative experience for participants due to its emphasis on self-work and its impact on a personal level. Practitioners felt adequately prepared by their training for dialogic practice, yet becoming an OD practitioner was seen as a continual process extending beyond formal training, necessitating ongoing engagement with the approach and organisational support. However, the commitment of participants to deliver optimal dialogic care was occasionally impeded by organisational constraints, resource limitations, and often having to concurrently deliver conventional care alongside Open Dialogue.
Authors
- Tim D. Weaver (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3437-3556)
- Claire Melia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7929-3587)
- Eleftherios Anestis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7309-3883)
- Katherine Clarke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5353-0230)
- Steve Pilling
Institutions
- Civil Service (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Middlesex University London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Published
- 2024-08-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1432327
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.55
Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Programme Grants for Applied Research