Cardiac sensing at a spinal cord stimulation lead: a promising on-device potential biomarker for pain and wellbeing

<b>Introduction:</b> In the search for objective measures of therapeutic outcomes for patients with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices, various metrics of cardiac performance have been linked to pain as well as overall health. To track such measures at home, recent studies have incorporated wearables to monitor cardiac activity over months or years. The drawbacks to wearables, such as patient compliance, would be obviated by on-device sensing that incorporates the SCS lead. This study sought to evaluate the feasibility of using SCS leads to record cardiac electrograms. <b>Methods:</b> The quality of signals sensed by externalized, percutaneous leads in the thoracic spine of 10 subjects at the end of their SCS trial were characterized across various electrode configurations and postures by detecting R-peaks and calculating signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In a subset of 5 subjects, cardiac metrics were then compared to those measured simultaneously with a wearable. <b>Results:</b> The average signal quality was acceptable for R-peak detection (i.e., SNR > 5) for all configurations and positions across all 10 subjects, with higher signal quality achieved when recording in resting positions. Notably, the spinal lead recordings enabled more reliable beat detection compared to the wearable (<i>n</i> = 29 recording pairs; <i>p</i> < 0.001). When excluding wearable recordings with over 35% missed beats, the inter-beat intervals across devices were highly correlated (<i>n</i> = 22 recording pairs; Pearson correlation: R = 0.99, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Further comparisons in these aligned wearable and corresponding spinal-lead recordings revealed significant differences in the frequency domain metrics (i.e., absolute and normalized high and low frequency HRV power, <i>p</i> < 0.05), but not in time domain HRV parameters. <b>Discussion:</b> The ability of an implanted SCS system to record electrocardiograms, as demonstrated here, could provide the basis of automated SCS therapy by tracking potential biomarkers of the patient's overall health state without the need for additional external devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Physiology
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1342983
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiac sensing at a spinal cord stimulation lead: a promising on-device potential biomarker for pain and wellbeing

David Dinsmoor, AnneMarie K. Brinda, Lisa Goudman, Juan Manuel Montes Hincapié et al.
3 citations
Frontiers in Physiology
Pain Management and Treatment
1.92
article

Cardiac sensing at a spinal cord stimulation lead: a promising on-device potential biomarker for pain and wellbeing

David Dinsmoor, AnneMarie K. Brinda, Lisa Goudman, Juan Manuel Montes Hincapié, Leonid M. Litvak, Maarten Moens, Małgorzata Straka
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> In the search for objective measures of therapeutic outcomes for patients with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices, various metrics of cardiac performance have been linked to pain as well as overall health. To track such measures at home, recent studies have incorporated wearables to monitor cardiac activity over months or years. The drawbacks to wearables, such as patient compliance, would be obviated by on-device sensing that incorporates the SCS lead. This study sought to evaluate the feasibility of using SCS leads to record cardiac electrograms. <b>Methods:</b> The quality of signals sensed by externalized, percutaneous leads in the thoracic spine of 10 subjects at the end of their SCS trial were characterized across various electrode configurations and postures by detecting R-peaks and calculating signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In a subset of 5 subjects, cardiac metrics were then compared to those measured simultaneously with a wearable. <b>Results:</b> The average signal quality was acceptable for R-peak detection (i.e., SNR > 5) for all configurations and positions across all 10 subjects, with higher signal quality achieved when recording in resting positions. Notably, the spinal lead recordings enabled more reliable beat detection compared to the wearable (<i>n</i> = 29 recording pairs; <i>p</i> < 0.001). When excluding wearable recordings with over 35% missed beats, the inter-beat intervals across devices were highly correlated (<i>n</i> = 22 recording pairs; Pearson correlation: R = 0.99, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Further comparisons in these aligned wearable and corresponding spinal-lead recordings revealed significant differences in the frequency domain metrics (i.e., absolute and normalized high and low frequency HRV power, <i>p</i> < 0.05), but not in time domain HRV parameters. <b>Discussion:</b> The ability of an implanted SCS system to record electrocardiograms, as demonstrated here, could provide the basis of automated SCS therapy by tracking potential biomarkers of the patient's overall health state without the need for additional external devices.

Frontiers in PhysiologyVol. 15
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Research Foundation - Flanders (BE), Medtronic (United States) (US), Pain in Motion (BE), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Pain Management and Treatment
1.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.