Critical discourse analysis on BTS commencement speech in dear class of 2020

The aim of the study is to examine the representative of critic in CDA and the hidden meaning in BTS Commencement Speech in Dear Class of 2020. The analysis of this research based on theory of CDA and its analysis methods which were represented by Van Dijk. Whereas the discussion used descriptive qualitative research method which deals with data that are in the form of word, rather than statistics and attempts to arrive at a rich description of something systematically. It starts by analyzing the represented critic on the text and separated them into an expression from each data. Then, it is continued by analyzing the hidden meaning of the text. Since it is a critical discourse, therefore those features are analyzed critically. The result shows that CDA can explore the relationships among language, power, ando ideology. Through the language used, it can be known the strength of power and the purpose of the speaker, which the power is strongly felt and the ideology is clearly seen as well as understandable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education, Social & Communication Studies.
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58881/jescs.v1i2.11
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical discourse analysis on BTS commencement speech in dear class of 2020

I Made Netra, Ni Putu Mutia Amandari, Ni Made Suwari
4 citations
Journal of Education, Social & Communication Studies.
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
15.63
article

Critical discourse analysis on BTS commencement speech in dear class of 2020

I Made Netra, Ni Putu Mutia Amandari, Ni Made Suwari
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The aim of the study is to examine the representative of critic in CDA and the hidden meaning in BTS Commencement Speech in Dear Class of 2020. The analysis of this research based on theory of CDA and its analysis methods which were represented by Van Dijk. Whereas the discussion used descriptive qualitative research method which deals with data that are in the form of word, rather than statistics and attempts to arrive at a rich description of something systematically. It starts by analyzing the represented critic on the text and separated them into an expression from each data. Then, it is continued by analyzing the hidden meaning of the text. Since it is a critical discourse, therefore those features are analyzed critically. The result shows that CDA can explore the relationships among language, power, ando ideology. Through the language used, it can be known the strength of power and the purpose of the speaker, which the power is strongly felt and the ideology is clearly seen as well as understandable.

Journal of Education, Social & Communication Studies.Vol. 1(2)
Udayana University (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
15.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.