UNMASKING ISRAEL'S ACTIONS: WHITE PHOSPHORUS AND INTERNATIONAL LAW BREACHES IN ISRAEL - PALESTINE CONFLICT

Israel has been accused of using White Phosphorus (WP) chemical weapons on populated areas. Although its use is not prohibited, there are several conditions that limit the use of WP in warfare as stipulated in International Humanitarian Law and several other international conventions. Israel argued that the use of WP was to cover the movement of their soldiers against Hamas soldiers and not to target people. This has drawn pros and cons from various legal experts and human rights observers. This article discusses the issue by focusing on the restrictions on the use of WP in international law. The method used is normative legal research that relies on international conventions. The conclusion obtained is that there is no prohibition on the use of WP in war, but it is necessary to pay attention to the objectives and procedures for using WP in war, such as not being used in community areas or by air. This answers the debate that Israel is guilty of misusing WP weapons in areas where there are communities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Petita Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah
Published
2024-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v9i2.298
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UNMASKING ISRAEL'S ACTIONS: WHITE PHOSPHORUS AND INTERNATIONAL LAW BREACHES IN ISRAEL - PALESTINE CONFLICT

Muhammad Nur Islami, Manuel Beltrán Genovés
Petita Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
article

UNMASKING ISRAEL'S ACTIONS: WHITE PHOSPHORUS AND INTERNATIONAL LAW BREACHES IN ISRAEL - PALESTINE CONFLICT

Muhammad Nur Islami, Manuel Beltrán Genovés
article en

Abstract

Israel has been accused of using White Phosphorus (WP) chemical weapons on populated areas. Although its use is not prohibited, there are several conditions that limit the use of WP in warfare as stipulated in International Humanitarian Law and several other international conventions. Israel argued that the use of WP was to cover the movement of their soldiers against Hamas soldiers and not to target people. This has drawn pros and cons from various legal experts and human rights observers. This article discusses the issue by focusing on the restrictions on the use of WP in international law. The method used is normative legal research that relies on international conventions. The conclusion obtained is that there is no prohibition on the use of WP in war, but it is necessary to pay attention to the objectives and procedures for using WP in war, such as not being used in community areas or by air. This answers the debate that Israel is guilty of misusing WP weapons in areas where there are communities.

Petita Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan SyariahVol. 9(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

UNMASKING ISRAEL'S ACTIONS: WHITE PHOSPHORUS AND INTERNATIONAL LAW BREACHES IN ISRAEL - PALESTINE CONFLICT — Muhammad Nur Islami, Manuel Beltrán Genovés · Petita Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS