<scp>3D</scp> surface defect map for assessing buccolingual profile of single tooth gaps following alveolar ridge preservation

A 3D surface defect map represents a useful tool for objectively quantifying ridge defects and profiles by assessing profilometric and surface differences compared to adjacent dentition using a single intraoral scan. This method also indicates that KMW may play a critical role in preventing concavity defects. The 3D defect map can guide decision-making during soft tissue augmentation procedures by emphasizing the specific location of the defect and providing more detailed insights into its localization. These parameters can enable the tailoring of flap management and soft tissue grafting strategies to address the patient's individual needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Published
2024-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13377
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3D surface defect map for assessing buccolingual profile of single tooth gaps following alveolar ridge preservation

Miha Pirc, Ronald E. Jung, Leonardo Mancini, Daniel Stefan Thoma et al.
4 citations
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
1.97
article

3D surface defect map for assessing buccolingual profile of single tooth gaps following alveolar ridge preservation

Miha Pirc, Ronald E. Jung, Leonardo Mancini, Daniel Stefan Thoma, Shayan Barootchi, Lorenzo Tavelli, Enrico Marchetti
article en
4 citations

Abstract

A 3D surface defect map represents a useful tool for objectively quantifying ridge defects and profiles by assessing profilometric and surface differences compared to adjacent dentition using a single intraoral scan. This method also indicates that KMW may play a critical role in preventing concavity defects. The 3D defect map can guide decision-making during soft tissue augmentation procedures by emphasizing the specific location of the defect and providing more detailed insights into its localization. These parameters can enable the tailoring of flap management and soft tissue grafting strategies to address the patient's individual needs.

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related ResearchVol. 26(6)
Harvard University (US), University of Zurich (CH), University of L'Aquila (IT), University of Michigan (US), Center for Clinical Research (United States) (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
1.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

<scp>3D</scp> surface defect map for assessing buccolingual profile of single tooth gaps following alveolar ridge preservation — Miha Pirc, Ronald E. Jung, et al. · Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS