The Importance of Timing—An Expert Evaluation on Latencies for Voice Assistants

In a driving simulator study, six experts interacted with an in-vehicle voice assistant (VA) and rated different latencies. The results suggest that in order to maintain drivers’ satisfaction with the interaction, in-vehicle VAs should have a latency of no more than 5 s. A slight delay of 1.5 s was rated best while shorter latencies caused highest variance amongst experts—indicating that the fastest response may not necessarily be the most desirable. Satisfaction may also depend on the complexity of the use case as experts showed higher tolerance toward longer latencies in the navigation-domain. Furthermore, our results raise thought-provoking insights about the importance of considering human expectations and preferences in the design of in-vehicle VAs. Despite technological advancements, humans might still expect a natural delay, similar to that in a human-human interaction. These findings emphasize the need to balance using cutting-edge technology with the desire for familiar interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241260290
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Importance of Timing—An Expert Evaluation on Latencies for Voice Assistants

Andreas Keinath, Josef F. Krems, Frederik Naujoks, Denise Sogemeier et al.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

The Importance of Timing—An Expert Evaluation on Latencies for Voice Assistants

Andreas Keinath, Josef F. Krems, Frederik Naujoks, Denise Sogemeier, Yannick Forster
article en

Abstract

In a driving simulator study, six experts interacted with an in-vehicle voice assistant (VA) and rated different latencies. The results suggest that in order to maintain drivers’ satisfaction with the interaction, in-vehicle VAs should have a latency of no more than 5 s. A slight delay of 1.5 s was rated best while shorter latencies caused highest variance amongst experts—indicating that the fastest response may not necessarily be the most desirable. Satisfaction may also depend on the complexity of the use case as experts showed higher tolerance toward longer latencies in the navigation-domain. Furthermore, our results raise thought-provoking insights about the importance of considering human expectations and preferences in the design of in-vehicle VAs. Despite technological advancements, humans might still expect a natural delay, similar to that in a human-human interaction. These findings emphasize the need to balance using cutting-edge technology with the desire for familiar interactions.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
Chemnitz University of Technology (DE), BMW Group (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.