Human-Integrated System Simulation Analysis “in the Wild”

Systems engineers often use model-based simulations to evaluate design concepts before building physical prototypes and running live experiments. However, their simulations typically lack infrastructure representing human behavior (e.g., cognitive tasks) and performance measures (e.g., workload). While human factors practitioners have developed simulation approaches that include such infrastructure, they typically employ languages, tools, and techniques that engineering teams cannot easily adopt given real-world budget and schedule constraints. To address this challenge, we propose a novel, lightweight approach to human-integrated system simulation analysis. Our approach enables the analyst to take a preexisting system model, add minimal human-model infrastructure, and run whole-system simulations that produce operator-workload and task-duration estimates, all using a common engineering language and tool, SysML and Cameo Systems Modeler, and any preexisting behavioral modeling technique. We demonstrate the approach using a simple, preexisting model of a fictitious space-telescope system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241260313
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human-Integrated System Simulation Analysis “in the Wild”

Andrew J. Abbate, Maia B. Cook
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Human-Integrated System Simulation Analysis “in the Wild”

Andrew J. Abbate, Maia B. Cook
article en

Abstract

Systems engineers often use model-based simulations to evaluate design concepts before building physical prototypes and running live experiments. However, their simulations typically lack infrastructure representing human behavior (e.g., cognitive tasks) and performance measures (e.g., workload). While human factors practitioners have developed simulation approaches that include such infrastructure, they typically employ languages, tools, and techniques that engineering teams cannot easily adopt given real-world budget and schedule constraints. To address this challenge, we propose a novel, lightweight approach to human-integrated system simulation analysis. Our approach enables the analyst to take a preexisting system model, add minimal human-model infrastructure, and run whole-system simulations that produce operator-workload and task-duration estimates, all using a common engineering language and tool, SysML and Cameo Systems Modeler, and any preexisting behavioral modeling technique. We demonstrate the approach using a simple, preexisting model of a fictitious space-telescope system.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific (US), Pacific Science Center (US)
Office of Naval Research
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Human-Integrated System Simulation Analysis “in the Wild” — Andrew J. Abbate, Maia B. Cook · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS