Comparison of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Live and Video Models Observation on Basketball Dribbling and Shooting Skills in 13-15-Year-Old Females

Background: In recent years, there has been various research on observational learning and its different characteristics and methods through live and video models. Objectives: In this regard, the aim of the current research was to compare the observation of live and video models of the the homogeneous or heterogeneous on basketball dribbling and shooting performance. Methods: Forty-eight 13 - 15-year-old (14 ± 2) female students were randomly assigned into four groups (observing a live female model, a live male model, a female video model, and a male video model). The research was conducted in three phase: (1) pre-test, (2) post-test, and (3) retention test. In the pre-test, the subjects of all four groups performed the dribble and basketball shot test, then observed the implementation of these skills in one of the four models according to the group they were in. After observing the model, the individuals in each group were given a post-test and a retention test after 24 hours. Results: The results showed that in both dribbling and shooting skills, observing the live man model had a greater effect on the acquisition and learning of skills, whereas observing the video models of both men and women had no significant effect on the acquisition and learning of the desired skills. Conclusions: The results showed us that observing a live model is better than a video model, and a model of the opposite sex is more effective than a model of the same sex for femals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Motor Control and Learning
Published
2024-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5812/jmcl-149939
Primary Topic
Sports and Physical Education Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Live and Video Models Observation on Basketball Dribbling and Shooting Skills in 13-15-Year-Old Females

Faezeh Zali, Hasan Mohammadzade
Journal of Motor Control and Learning
Sports and Physical Education Research
article

Comparison of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Live and Video Models Observation on Basketball Dribbling and Shooting Skills in 13-15-Year-Old Females

Faezeh Zali, Hasan Mohammadzade
article en

Abstract

Background: In recent years, there has been various research on observational learning and its different characteristics and methods through live and video models. Objectives: In this regard, the aim of the current research was to compare the observation of live and video models of the the homogeneous or heterogeneous on basketball dribbling and shooting performance. Methods: Forty-eight 13 - 15-year-old (14 ± 2) female students were randomly assigned into four groups (observing a live female model, a live male model, a female video model, and a male video model). The research was conducted in three phase: (1) pre-test, (2) post-test, and (3) retention test. In the pre-test, the subjects of all four groups performed the dribble and basketball shot test, then observed the implementation of these skills in one of the four models according to the group they were in. After observing the model, the individuals in each group were given a post-test and a retention test after 24 hours. Results: The results showed that in both dribbling and shooting skills, observing the live man model had a greater effect on the acquisition and learning of skills, whereas observing the video models of both men and women had no significant effect on the acquisition and learning of the desired skills. Conclusions: The results showed us that observing a live model is better than a video model, and a model of the opposite sex is more effective than a model of the same sex for femals.

Journal of Motor Control and LearningVol. 6(2)
Urmia University (IR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Sports and Physical Education Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.