Cash is king? Understanding financing risk in housing markets

Abstract In Los Angeles, all-cash home purchases quintupled during the last decade. Compared with an else-equal mortgage offer, a cash offer is associated with 29 percent shorter time-to-close and a 2–3.9 percent price discount, indicating a substantial amount of financing risk—the risk to a seller that a transaction may not close on time and may fail to occur again because a mortgage contingency fails. The estimated cash discount aligns well with a canonical model calibrated to the sample market. Our findings reveal that closing risk alone is insufficient to explain the cash discount. Rather, it turns on the possibility that a property back on the market may fail to sell, requiring a substantial risk compensation. The estimated cash discount is smaller during booms and in larger markets, highlighting the inseparability of financial frictions in the mortgage market and search frictions in the housing market.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Finance Review
Published
2024-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfae025
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cash is king? Understanding financing risk in housing markets

Seung‐Hyun Hong, Lu Han
6 citations
European Finance Review
Housing Market and Economics
3.39
article

Cash is king? Understanding financing risk in housing markets

Seung‐Hyun Hong, Lu Han
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract In Los Angeles, all-cash home purchases quintupled during the last decade. Compared with an else-equal mortgage offer, a cash offer is associated with 29 percent shorter time-to-close and a 2–3.9 percent price discount, indicating a substantial amount of financing risk—the risk to a seller that a transaction may not close on time and may fail to occur again because a mortgage contingency fails. The estimated cash discount aligns well with a canonical model calibrated to the sample market. Our findings reveal that closing risk alone is insufficient to explain the cash discount. Rather, it turns on the possibility that a property back on the market may fail to sell, requiring a substantial risk compensation. The estimated cash discount is smaller during booms and in larger markets, highlighting the inseparability of financial frictions in the mortgage market and search frictions in the housing market.

European Finance ReviewVol. 28(6)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
National Science Foundation, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Housing Market and Economics
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cash is king? Understanding financing risk in housing markets — Seung‐Hyun Hong, Lu Han · European Finance Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS