Open management of rectal wound after transanal endoscopic microsurgery: randomized prospective study

INTRODUCTION: the wound following Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) is traditionally closed by suturing. However, some studies suggest that leaving the wound open after TEM might be a viable alternative. STUDY OBJECTIVE: to compare two methods of managing rectal wounds in patients after TEM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: patients were divided into 2 groups: the main group (open wound management) and the control group (suture wound management). The primary endpoint of the study was the morbidity rate. The secondary endpoints included the need and duration of antibacterial therapy, post-op hospital stay, the severity of the inflammatory response, the wound healing time and the quality of life. RESULTS: from November 2021 to November 2023, 177 patients were included in the randomized study: 68 in the open wound management group and 109 in the suture wound group. The analysis included 50 patients in eachgroup. It was found that the operation time in the main group was significantly shorter (30 (20; 40) minutes versus 55 (40; 60), p < 0.0001). The infectious complications rate was lower in the open wound management group: 11/50 (22 %) versus 16/50 (32 %), p = 0.26; the postoperative bleeding rate was higher: 4/50 (8 %) versus 2/50 (4 %), p = 0.7. Post-op hospital stay did not differ: 6 (4;7) days versus 6 (5; 7), p = 0.22. The duration of antibiotic therapy for infectious complications was longer in the open wound management group: 6 (5;6) days versus 5 (5;6.5), p = 0.02. In the case of infectious complication the inflammatory response was higher in the group of the open wound management: white blood cell counts (15.9 (14.3; 19.5) × 109/L versus 13.1 (12; 15.6) × 109/L, p = 0.01) and temperature (38.6 ± 0.7 °C versus 38 ± 0.6 °C, p = 0.02). Wounds in both groups healed by the 30 th day, and the quality of life did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: the results of the randomized study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of open rectal wound management after TEM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Koloproktologia
Published
2024-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2024-23-3-69-78
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open management of rectal wound after transanal endoscopic microsurgery: randomized prospective study

E. A. Khomyakov, Е. Г. Рыбаков, С. В. Чернышов, R. K. Sinitsyn et al.
Koloproktologia
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Open management of rectal wound after transanal endoscopic microsurgery: randomized prospective study

E. A. Khomyakov, Е. Г. Рыбаков, С. В. Чернышов, R. K. Sinitsyn, M. V. Alekseev
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: the wound following Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) is traditionally closed by suturing. However, some studies suggest that leaving the wound open after TEM might be a viable alternative. STUDY OBJECTIVE: to compare two methods of managing rectal wounds in patients after TEM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: patients were divided into 2 groups: the main group (open wound management) and the control group (suture wound management). The primary endpoint of the study was the morbidity rate. The secondary endpoints included the need and duration of antibacterial therapy, post-op hospital stay, the severity of the inflammatory response, the wound healing time and the quality of life. RESULTS: from November 2021 to November 2023, 177 patients were included in the randomized study: 68 in the open wound management group and 109 in the suture wound group. The analysis included 50 patients in eachgroup. It was found that the operation time in the main group was significantly shorter (30 (20; 40) minutes versus 55 (40; 60), p < 0.0001). The infectious complications rate was lower in the open wound management group: 11/50 (22 %) versus 16/50 (32 %), p = 0.26; the postoperative bleeding rate was higher: 4/50 (8 %) versus 2/50 (4 %), p = 0.7. Post-op hospital stay did not differ: 6 (4;7) days versus 6 (5; 7), p = 0.22. The duration of antibiotic therapy for infectious complications was longer in the open wound management group: 6 (5;6) days versus 5 (5;6.5), p = 0.02. In the case of infectious complication the inflammatory response was higher in the group of the open wound management: white blood cell counts (15.9 (14.3; 19.5) × 109/L versus 13.1 (12; 15.6) × 109/L, p = 0.01) and temperature (38.6 ± 0.7 °C versus 38 ± 0.6 °C, p = 0.02). Wounds in both groups healed by the 30 th day, and the quality of life did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: the results of the randomized study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of open rectal wound management after TEM.

KoloproktologiaVol. 23(3)
State Scientific Center of Coloproctology (RU), Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.