Enhanced Carbon Storage Forecasting via Cross-Geology Transfer Learning

Rapid simulation of the spatiotemporal evolution of pressure & saturation for SACROC 1. Neural operator was trained on only 153 simulation runs 2. Trained to account for heterogeneity and variations/uncertainties in engineering, fluids, and geology 3. Pressure forecast has less than 1% error 4. Saturation forecast has less than 2% error 5. Traditional simulator takes 1 hour for a single scenario, while neural operator takes less than 1 minute. Rapid simulation of the spatiotemporal evolution of pressure & saturation for IBDP 1. Transfer Learning was implemented on the SACROC-based Neural Operator that was trained on only 20 simulation runs for IBDP Site 2. SACROC and IBDP Sites have several significant differences in geology and engineering parameters. 3. Pressure forecast has less than 5 psi error 4. Saturation forecast has less than 7% error 5. Traditional simulator takes 1 hour for a single scenario, while neural operator takes less than 1 minute and only 20 simulations for training/validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2172/2426927
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced Carbon Storage Forecasting via Cross-Geology Transfer Learning

Siddharth Misra
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
article

Enhanced Carbon Storage Forecasting via Cross-Geology Transfer Learning

Siddharth Misra
article en

Abstract

Rapid simulation of the spatiotemporal evolution of pressure & saturation for SACROC 1. Neural operator was trained on only 153 simulation runs 2. Trained to account for heterogeneity and variations/uncertainties in engineering, fluids, and geology 3. Pressure forecast has less than 1% error 4. Saturation forecast has less than 2% error 5. Traditional simulator takes 1 hour for a single scenario, while neural operator takes less than 1 minute. Rapid simulation of the spatiotemporal evolution of pressure & saturation for IBDP 1. Transfer Learning was implemented on the SACROC-based Neural Operator that was trained on only 20 simulation runs for IBDP Site 2. SACROC and IBDP Sites have several significant differences in geology and engineering parameters. 3. Pressure forecast has less than 5 psi error 4. Saturation forecast has less than 7% error 5. Traditional simulator takes 1 hour for a single scenario, while neural operator takes less than 1 minute and only 20 simulations for training/validation.

Mitchell Institute (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhanced Carbon Storage Forecasting via Cross-Geology Transfer Learning — Siddharth Misra · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS