Momentary autonomic engagement during parent–adolescent conflict: Coping as a moderator of associations with emotions
Regulatory efforts are hypothesized to affect associations between emotions and physiology (i.e., concordance) to facilitate adaptive functioning. Assessing the role of coping on physiological-emotional concordance during ecologically relevant scenarios can elucidate whether concordance can serve as a biomarker of risk or resilience. The present study assessed self-reported coping as a moderator of minute-to-minute associations between autonomic nervous system activity and emotions (i.e., physiological-emotional concordance) in caregivers (N = 97) and adolescents (N = 97; ages 10-15) during a dyadic conflict task. Models included physiological variables (sympathetic, skin conductance level [SCL]; and parasympathetic, respiratory sinus arrhythmia [RSA]) and their interaction (SCL × RSA) as predictors of emotions, with coping variables as moderators. Caregivers' use of primary control coping (e.g., problem solving and emotional expression) and secondary control coping (e.g., cognitive reappraisal and acceptance) use in response to family stress predicted more positive emotional experiences during the laboratory conflict task. Adolescents' use of secondary control coping moderated the SCL-emotion association, such that increases in momentary SCL were associated with more positive emotion ratings for youth reporting higher secondary control coping. For youth who report more adaptive trait-level coping skills, momentary changes in SCL may reflect active engagement and attentiveness to facilitate more positive emotional experiences. Findings advance our understanding of the interrelationships between physiological responses and psychological experiences during relevant, interactive scenarios. Autonomic responses are differentially related to affective states depending on the coping strategies that adolescents employ, suggesting that concordance may be associated with intervention targets (i.e., coping skills).
Authors
- Meredith A. Gruhn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5523-8871)
- Jon Ebert
- Abagail E. Ciriegio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8018-8562)
- Allison Vreeland (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0397-5888)
- Lauren M. Henry (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0286-9319)
- David A. Cole (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7535-1230)
- Tarah Kuhn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0606-8877)
- Kelly H. Watson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6700-651X)
- Allegra S. Anderson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0961-9016)
- Bruce E. Compas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5884-181X)
- Rachel E. Siciliano (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5958-6550)
- Qimin Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3840-1136)
Institutions
- Boston University (US)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Psychophysiology
- Published
- 2024-08-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14666
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.28
Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development