Species assemblages and their drivers differ between trees and lianas in a seasonal evergreen forest in Thailand

Abstract Despite a long tradition in ecology of studying tree species assembly and its potential drivers in tropical forest communities, little information exists with respect to lianas (woody climbers), the second most abundant life form of woody plants in tropical forests. Lianas influence forest diversity and stability and provide critical resources for forest fauna. Using a unique dataset of a 30‐ha plot in Thailand, where tree and liana individuals were fully mapped, we investigated the degree to which local species assemblages of trees and lianas of different size classes (i.e., seedlings, established individuals, and large individuals) are related to local environmental conditions. We asked (1) What are the spatial patterns and environmental drivers of local tree and liana species assemblages? (2) How do such patterns and drivers differ among size classes? (3) Which species associate with these assemblages? Local assemblages of established trees showed substantial structuring by environmental variables, whereas we found only weakly structured assemblages of tree seedlings, large trees, and lianas of all size classes. Our results indicated that the biotic and abiotic drivers of local species assemblages differed strongly between tree and liana communities and across size classes. Species assemblages of trees were mainly driven by soil nutrients, leading to patchy assemblages associated with high base saturation (Alfisols) and assemblages associated with lower levels of base saturation and higher aluminum (Ultisols), whereas tree seedling assemblages were only weakly structured by riparian zones. In contrast, species assemblages of established and large lianas were primarily associated with forest canopy structure, separating low‐canopy forests from high‐canopy forests, whereas soil nutrients were the only factors associated with liana seedling assemblages. The weak environmental structuring of tree seedlings and large trees suggests that other mechanisms, such as stochastic disturbances, competition for space, or animal seed dispersal, may play an important role in structuring tree communities in this seasonal tropical forest. The weak patterns observed in liana communities across all life stages raise questions about the underlying mechanisms of liana community assembly, and further research should focus on liana niches, their dispersal mechanisms, and host tree relations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosphere
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4942
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Species assemblages and their drivers differ between trees and lianas in a seasonal evergreen forest in Thailand

Warren Y. Brockelman, Rajapandian Kanagaraj, Nitin Kumar Tripathi, Anuttara Nathalang et al.
2 citations
Ecosphere
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
1.38
article

Species assemblages and their drivers differ between trees and lianas in a seasonal evergreen forest in Thailand

Warren Y. Brockelman, Rajapandian Kanagaraj, Nitin Kumar Tripathi, Anuttara Nathalang, Wirong Chanthorn, Maxime Réjou‐Méchain, Thorsten Wiegand, Stuart J. Davies, Zhenhua Sun
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Despite a long tradition in ecology of studying tree species assembly and its potential drivers in tropical forest communities, little information exists with respect to lianas (woody climbers), the second most abundant life form of woody plants in tropical forests. Lianas influence forest diversity and stability and provide critical resources for forest fauna. Using a unique dataset of a 30‐ha plot in Thailand, where tree and liana individuals were fully mapped, we investigated the degree to which local species assemblages of trees and lianas of different size classes (i.e., seedlings, established individuals, and large individuals) are related to local environmental conditions. We asked (1) What are the spatial patterns and environmental drivers of local tree and liana species assemblages? (2) How do such patterns and drivers differ among size classes? (3) Which species associate with these assemblages? Local assemblages of established trees showed substantial structuring by environmental variables, whereas we found only weakly structured assemblages of tree seedlings, large trees, and lianas of all size classes. Our results indicated that the biotic and abiotic drivers of local species assemblages differed strongly between tree and liana communities and across size classes. Species assemblages of trees were mainly driven by soil nutrients, leading to patchy assemblages associated with high base saturation (Alfisols) and assemblages associated with lower levels of base saturation and higher aluminum (Ultisols), whereas tree seedling assemblages were only weakly structured by riparian zones. In contrast, species assemblages of established and large lianas were primarily associated with forest canopy structure, separating low‐canopy forests from high‐canopy forests, whereas soil nutrients were the only factors associated with liana seedling assemblages. The weak environmental structuring of tree seedlings and large trees suggests that other mechanisms, such as stochastic disturbances, competition for space, or animal seed dispersal, may play an important role in structuring tree communities in this seasonal tropical forest. The weak patterns observed in liana communities across all life stages raise questions about the underlying mechanisms of liana community assembly, and further research should focus on liana niches, their dispersal mechanisms, and host tree relations.

EcosphereVol. 15(8)
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), National Science and Technology Development Agency (TH), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Kasetsart University (TH), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Université de Montpellier (FR), Mahidol University (TH), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (CN), Asian Institute of Technology (TH), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), UMR Botanique et Modélisation de l’Architecture des Plantes et des végétations (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), French Institute of Pondicherry (IN)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand Research Fund, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.