Performance evaluation of concrete comprising sugarcane bagasse ash and recycled polyethylene terephthalate

Concrete production faces challenges due to the depletion of natural sand and the need for more sustainable practices. This study investigates the use of sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) and recycled polyethylene terephthalate (RPET) as partial replacements for cement and sand, respectively. SCBA was tested as a 5%, 10%, and 15% replacement by weight of cement, while RPET was used as a 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% substitute for sand by volume. Concrete samples were cured in water for 7, 28, and 56 days. The mix with 5% SCBA and 10% RPET showed comparable compressive strength to conventional concrete and improved split tensile strength by 1.2% and 11.61% at 28 and 56 days, respectively. The compressive strength-to-weight ratio of this blend was less than 3% lower than conventional concrete. This combination also maintained similar water absorption and fire resistance characteristics. These results suggest that 5% SCBA and 10% RPET are effective in enhancing the sustainability of concrete while maintaining structural performance, contributing to more environmentally friendly construction practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Structural Engineering
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2024.2387998
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance evaluation of concrete comprising sugarcane bagasse ash and recycled polyethylene terephthalate

Benard Omondi, Chukwuemeka Daniel, Richard Ocharo Onchiri
5 citations
Australian Journal of Structural Engineering
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
1.30
article

Performance evaluation of concrete comprising sugarcane bagasse ash and recycled polyethylene terephthalate

Benard Omondi, Chukwuemeka Daniel, Richard Ocharo Onchiri
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Concrete production faces challenges due to the depletion of natural sand and the need for more sustainable practices. This study investigates the use of sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) and recycled polyethylene terephthalate (RPET) as partial replacements for cement and sand, respectively. SCBA was tested as a 5%, 10%, and 15% replacement by weight of cement, while RPET was used as a 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% substitute for sand by volume. Concrete samples were cured in water for 7, 28, and 56 days. The mix with 5% SCBA and 10% RPET showed comparable compressive strength to conventional concrete and improved split tensile strength by 1.2% and 11.61% at 28 and 56 days, respectively. The compressive strength-to-weight ratio of this blend was less than 3% lower than conventional concrete. This combination also maintained similar water absorption and fire resistance characteristics. These results suggest that 5% SCBA and 10% RPET are effective in enhancing the sustainability of concrete while maintaining structural performance, contributing to more environmentally friendly construction practices.

Australian Journal of Structural EngineeringVol. 26(3)
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (KE), Technical University of Mombasa (KE), Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology (KE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance evaluation of concrete comprising sugarcane bagasse ash and recycled polyethylene terephthalate — Benard Omondi, Chukwuemeka Daniel, et al. · Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS