Exploring the Solow Paradox: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China on Smart City Pilots and Corporate Total Factor Productivity

The development of smart cities plays a crucial role in facilitating the integration of economic and ecological benefits within urban contexts. However, whether this could benefit firms has received limited attention in existing studies. This study aims to investigate the relationship between smart city pilots (SCPs) and corporate total factor productivity (TFP), examining the potential mechanisms and different heterogeneities. Utilizing a difference-in-difference strategy with Chinese listed firms’ data from 2005 to 2020, a quasi-natural experiment was conducted to test the proposed hypotheses based on the three batches of SCPs in China from 2012 to 2014. The empirical analyses showed that SCPs can significantly decrease corporate TFP (β = −0.075, p < 0.01). It was further revealed that this association is mediated by corporate governance practices (z = −2.4, p < 0.05). Moreover, the results uncovered the presence of heterogeneities, particularly concerning geographical location and urban scale, with a stronger inhibitory impact on TFP in the eastern region and supercities. These findings provide empirical evidence supporting the Solow paradox theory and furnish insightful references for other similar developing countries to refine the strategies in smart city development, thereby achieving more favorable outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jupddm.upeng-5156
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Solow Paradox: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China on Smart City Pilots and Corporate Total Factor Productivity

Rong Guo, Mingchuan Yu, Hengqin Wu, Yilong Han et al.
5 citations
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
2.45
article

Exploring the Solow Paradox: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China on Smart City Pilots and Corporate Total Factor Productivity

Rong Guo, Mingchuan Yu, Hengqin Wu, Yilong Han, Han Lin, Ninger Lou
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The development of smart cities plays a crucial role in facilitating the integration of economic and ecological benefits within urban contexts. However, whether this could benefit firms has received limited attention in existing studies. This study aims to investigate the relationship between smart city pilots (SCPs) and corporate total factor productivity (TFP), examining the potential mechanisms and different heterogeneities. Utilizing a difference-in-difference strategy with Chinese listed firms’ data from 2005 to 2020, a quasi-natural experiment was conducted to test the proposed hypotheses based on the three batches of SCPs in China from 2012 to 2014. The empirical analyses showed that SCPs can significantly decrease corporate TFP (β = −0.075, p < 0.01). It was further revealed that this association is mediated by corporate governance practices (z = −2.4, p < 0.05). Moreover, the results uncovered the presence of heterogeneities, particularly concerning geographical location and urban scale, with a stronger inhibitory impact on TFP in the eastern region and supercities. These findings provide empirical evidence supporting the Solow paradox theory and furnish insightful references for other similar developing countries to refine the strategies in smart city development, thereby achieving more favorable outcomes.

Journal of Urban Planning and DevelopmentVol. 150(4)
Ningbo University (CN), Tongji University (CN), Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (CN), Ningbo University of Technology (CN), Nanjing Audit University (CN), Shanghai Institute of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.