Magnetic surface geometry inversion of Kimberlites in Botswana

Abstract Surface geometry inversion of geophysical data has recently been introduced as an effective approach for generating surface‐based geological models. The models obtained through surface geometry inversion clearly delineate the contacts between distinct rock units, making them easily interpretable by geologists. Surface geometry inversion has shown promising preliminary results in other works, but the practical application of surface geometry inversion on real geophysical data has not been thoroughly investigated. To move towards a better understanding of the practicalities involved, we applied surface geometry inversion to a real magnetic dataset acquired over two kimberlite pipes located in north‐central Botswana. The objective was to assess the effectiveness and limitations of the surface geometry inversion approach in accurately characterizing the subsurface geometry and identifying the boundaries of the kimberlite pipes. We first perform an anomaly separation approach to isolate the magnetic anomalies associated with the kimberlite pipes. A surface geometry inversion algorithm was applied to the original and separated datasets using various initial models and other control parameters. Several tests were performed to investigate the effects that data processing, initial models, and other parameter choices have on the surface geometry inversion results. We successfully recover the geometry, extension and dip of the two kimberlite pipes. We discuss the results of our various tests and provide advice for practitioners interested in applying surface geometry inversion methods to their data. Our work indicates that surface geometry inversion can be used as a complementary approach to voxel inversion, and we propose an iterative surface geometry inversion algorithm as a possible alternative approach to voxel inversion for simple geological scenarios. This work provides valuable insights into the appropriate application of surface geometry inversion on real geophysical datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Prospecting
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.13588
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magnetic surface geometry inversion of Kimberlites in Botswana

Kevin Mickus, Peter G. Lelièvre, Saeed Vatankhah, Kitso Matende
2 citations
Geophysical Prospecting
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
1.07
article

Magnetic surface geometry inversion of Kimberlites in Botswana

Kevin Mickus, Peter G. Lelièvre, Saeed Vatankhah, Kitso Matende
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Surface geometry inversion of geophysical data has recently been introduced as an effective approach for generating surface‐based geological models. The models obtained through surface geometry inversion clearly delineate the contacts between distinct rock units, making them easily interpretable by geologists. Surface geometry inversion has shown promising preliminary results in other works, but the practical application of surface geometry inversion on real geophysical data has not been thoroughly investigated. To move towards a better understanding of the practicalities involved, we applied surface geometry inversion to a real magnetic dataset acquired over two kimberlite pipes located in north‐central Botswana. The objective was to assess the effectiveness and limitations of the surface geometry inversion approach in accurately characterizing the subsurface geometry and identifying the boundaries of the kimberlite pipes. We first perform an anomaly separation approach to isolate the magnetic anomalies associated with the kimberlite pipes. A surface geometry inversion algorithm was applied to the original and separated datasets using various initial models and other control parameters. Several tests were performed to investigate the effects that data processing, initial models, and other parameter choices have on the surface geometry inversion results. We successfully recover the geometry, extension and dip of the two kimberlite pipes. We discuss the results of our various tests and provide advice for practitioners interested in applying surface geometry inversion methods to their data. Our work indicates that surface geometry inversion can be used as a complementary approach to voxel inversion, and we propose an iterative surface geometry inversion algorithm as a possible alternative approach to voxel inversion for simple geological scenarios. This work provides valuable insights into the appropriate application of surface geometry inversion on real geophysical datasets.

Geophysical ProspectingVol. 72(9)
Missouri State University (US), University of Botswana (BW), Mount Allison University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
1.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.