Job satisfaction of extension and advisory service providers of Meghalaya

This study investigates the job satisfaction of Extension and Advisory Service Providers (EASPs) in Meghalaya, India, focusing on three critical dimensions: satisfaction with pay, promotion, benefits, and rewards; satisfaction with supervisors, co-workers, and clienteles; and satisfaction with operating conditions and the nature of work. Conducted across the Garo, Jaintia, and Khasi regions, the research involved 56 EASPs from various extension service organizations, including the Department of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Agricultural Technology Management Agency, and Krishi Vigyan Kendra. An ex post facto research design was employed, utilizing a structured interview schedule to gather data on job satisfaction. Descriptive statistics and the Friedman test were used to analyze the data. The results indicate that 37.50 per cent of EASPs reported medium job satisfaction, 32.14% reported low satisfaction, and 30.36% reported high satisfaction. Dimension-wise analysis revealed that satisfaction with supervisors, co-workers, and clienteles was the highest (mean index score = 69.08), reflecting favorable perceptions of interpersonal relationships and support. In contrast, satisfaction with pay, promotion, benefits, and rewards was the lowest (mean index score = 60.30), highlighting concerns over incentives, allowances, pay, and promotion and career progression. Satisfaction with operating conditions and the nature of work scored an intermediate value (mean index score = 63.06), indicating mixed feelings about work resources and job roles. The Friedman test confirmed significant differences in job satisfaction across these dimensions, with the highest satisfaction related to interpersonal aspects and the lowest related to incentives, allowances, pay, and promotion. Addressing these issues, improving resource availability, and increasing clerical support are critical to enhancing overall job satisfaction. Such improvements would likely boost the effectiveness of EASPs and contribute to better agricultural outcomes in Meghalaya by facilitating timely and efficient service delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social Development
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/26180723.2024.v7.i8b.886
Primary Topic
Agricultural Economics and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Job satisfaction of extension and advisory service providers of Meghalaya

Ram Singh, M. Shanmukh Raju, Loukham Devarani, L. Hemochandra et al.
International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social Development
Agricultural Economics and Practices
article

Job satisfaction of extension and advisory service providers of Meghalaya

Ram Singh, M. Shanmukh Raju, Loukham Devarani, L. Hemochandra, RJ Singh
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the job satisfaction of Extension and Advisory Service Providers (EASPs) in Meghalaya, India, focusing on three critical dimensions: satisfaction with pay, promotion, benefits, and rewards; satisfaction with supervisors, co-workers, and clienteles; and satisfaction with operating conditions and the nature of work. Conducted across the Garo, Jaintia, and Khasi regions, the research involved 56 EASPs from various extension service organizations, including the Department of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Agricultural Technology Management Agency, and Krishi Vigyan Kendra. An ex post facto research design was employed, utilizing a structured interview schedule to gather data on job satisfaction. Descriptive statistics and the Friedman test were used to analyze the data. The results indicate that 37.50 per cent of EASPs reported medium job satisfaction, 32.14% reported low satisfaction, and 30.36% reported high satisfaction. Dimension-wise analysis revealed that satisfaction with supervisors, co-workers, and clienteles was the highest (mean index score = 69.08), reflecting favorable perceptions of interpersonal relationships and support. In contrast, satisfaction with pay, promotion, benefits, and rewards was the lowest (mean index score = 60.30), highlighting concerns over incentives, allowances, pay, and promotion and career progression. Satisfaction with operating conditions and the nature of work scored an intermediate value (mean index score = 63.06), indicating mixed feelings about work resources and job roles. The Friedman test confirmed significant differences in job satisfaction across these dimensions, with the highest satisfaction related to interpersonal aspects and the lowest related to incentives, allowances, pay, and promotion. Addressing these issues, improving resource availability, and increasing clerical support are critical to enhancing overall job satisfaction. Such improvements would likely boost the effectiveness of EASPs and contribute to better agricultural outcomes in Meghalaya by facilitating timely and efficient service delivery.

International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social DevelopmentVol. 7(8)
Central Agricultural University (IN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Agricultural Economics and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.