Poverty as capability deprivation: Considering the relational approach, group-based analysis, and socio-structural lens

Amartya Sen has argued that poverty means much more than lacking income: it means that a person falls short of securing a basic level of capabilities. His main justification for this claim is that we need to look at what is important in a person's life (what a person's actual functionings are, and what alternative outcomes could be achieved), rather than just at what a person has. In this article, I argue that, although Sen's conceptualisation expands our understanding of poverty, it can limit us when evaluating what is wrong with poverty. Conceptualising poverty in a diverse and unequal society rather requires a broader perspective, one capable of including an explicitly relational approach, group-based analysis, and a socio-structural lens. Otherwise, we miss the fundamental role played by systematic oppression in the context of poverty. In developing these ideas, my aim is to update the picture of poverty as capability deprivation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Social Theory
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310241270471
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poverty as capability deprivation: Considering the relational approach, group-based analysis, and socio-structural lens

Katarina Pitasse Fragoso
4 citations
European Journal of Social Theory
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
4.53
article

Poverty as capability deprivation: Considering the relational approach, group-based analysis, and socio-structural lens

Katarina Pitasse Fragoso
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Amartya Sen has argued that poverty means much more than lacking income: it means that a person falls short of securing a basic level of capabilities. His main justification for this claim is that we need to look at what is important in a person's life (what a person's actual functionings are, and what alternative outcomes could be achieved), rather than just at what a person has. In this article, I argue that, although Sen's conceptualisation expands our understanding of poverty, it can limit us when evaluating what is wrong with poverty. Conceptualising poverty in a diverse and unequal society rather requires a broader perspective, one capable of including an explicitly relational approach, group-based analysis, and a socio-structural lens. Otherwise, we miss the fundamental role played by systematic oppression in the context of poverty. In developing these ideas, my aim is to update the picture of poverty as capability deprivation.

European Journal of Social TheoryVol. 28(2)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
4.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Poverty as capability deprivation: Considering the relational approach, group-based analysis, and socio-structural lens — Katarina Pitasse Fragoso · European Journal of Social Theory (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS