Deep learning versus manual morphology-based embryo selection in IVF: a randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial

To assess the value of deep learning in selecting the optimal embryo for in vitro fertilization, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority parallel-group trial was conducted across 14 in vitro fertilization clinics in Australia and Europe. Women under 42 years of age with at least two early-stage blastocysts on day 5 were randomized to either the control arm, using standard morphological assessment, or the study arm, employing a deep learning algorithm, intelligent Data Analysis Score (iDAScore), for embryo selection. The primary endpoint was a clinical pregnancy rate with a noninferiority margin of 5%. The trial included 1,066 patients (533 in the iDAScore group and 533 in the morphology group). The iDAScore group exhibited a clinical pregnancy rate of 46.5% (248 of 533 patients), compared to 48.2% (257 of 533 patients) in the morphology arm (risk difference -1.7%; 95% confidence interval -7.7, 4.3; P = 0.62). This study was not able to demonstrate noninferiority of deep learning for clinical pregnancy rate when compared to standard morphology and a predefined prioritization scheme. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) registration: 379161 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Medicine
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03166-5
Citations
73
Primary Topic
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
39.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning versus manual morphology-based embryo selection in IVF: a randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial

Robert Lahoud, Jørgen Berntsen, Peter Illingworth, Rebecca L. Kelley et al.
73 citations
Nature Medicine
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
39.63
article

Deep learning versus manual morphology-based embryo selection in IVF: a randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial

Robert Lahoud, Jørgen Berntsen, Peter Illingworth, Rebecca L. Kelley, Thorir Hardarson, Lyndsey Zujovic, Scott McGill Nelson, Geoffrey Trew, Saran Ahitan, Susanne Wennerström, Johnny Hindkjær, David K. Gardner, Christos Venetis, Park Hannah, Aisling Ahlström, Anthony N. Price, Manveen Mangat, Kristy Demmers, Fleur Cattrall, Yee Shan Lisa Lee, Anna Vincent, Bettina Troest, Anette Gabrielsen, Mark G. Larman, Simon Cooke, Franca Agresta, Charlotte Knight
article en
73 citations

Abstract

To assess the value of deep learning in selecting the optimal embryo for in vitro fertilization, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority parallel-group trial was conducted across 14 in vitro fertilization clinics in Australia and Europe. Women under 42 years of age with at least two early-stage blastocysts on day 5 were randomized to either the control arm, using standard morphological assessment, or the study arm, employing a deep learning algorithm, intelligent Data Analysis Score (iDAScore), for embryo selection. The primary endpoint was a clinical pregnancy rate with a noninferiority margin of 5%. The trial included 1,066 patients (533 in the iDAScore group and 533 in the morphology group). The iDAScore group exhibited a clinical pregnancy rate of 46.5% (248 of 533 patients), compared to 48.2% (257 of 533 patients) in the morphology arm (risk difference -1.7%; 95% confidence interval -7.7, 4.3; P = 0.62). This study was not able to demonstrate noninferiority of deep learning for clinical pregnancy rate when compared to standard morphology and a predefined prioritization scheme. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) registration: 379161 .

Nature MedicineVol. 30(11)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Myer Foundation (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Moesgaard Museum (DK), Regional Hospital Horsens (DK), Vitrolife (Sweden) (SE), Australian Centre for HIV and Hepatitis Virology Research (AU), Oxford Fertility (GB), Imperial College London (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
39.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.