The survival outcomes of localized low‐risk prostate cancer, a population‐based study using <scp>NCDB</scp>

This study highlights the differences in survival outcomes among LRPC treatment modalities. RP was associated with improved survival compared to NLT, especially in younger patients. In contrast, EBRT and PSI showed survival benefits primarily in the older age groups. NLT is a reasonable choice, particularly in younger patients when RP is not chosen. These findings emphasize the importance of individualized treatment decisions for LRPC management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Medicine
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70060
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The survival outcomes of localized low‐risk prostate cancer, a population‐based study using NCDB

John Lyne, Yue Yin, Ángela Sanguino, Rodney E. Wegner et al.
1 citations
Cancer Medicine
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
0.42
article

The survival outcomes of localized low‐risk prostate cancer, a population‐based study using NCDB

John Lyne, Yue Yin, Ángela Sanguino, Rodney E. Wegner, Arash Samiei, Shifeng S. Mao, Ralph Miller, Jeffrey Cohen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study highlights the differences in survival outcomes among LRPC treatment modalities. RP was associated with improved survival compared to NLT, especially in younger patients. In contrast, EBRT and PSI showed survival benefits primarily in the older age groups. NLT is a reasonable choice, particularly in younger patients when RP is not chosen. These findings emphasize the importance of individualized treatment decisions for LRPC management.

Cancer MedicineVol. 13(15)
Allegheny Health Network (US), Allegheny-Singer Research Institute (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.