Predicting Food‐Security Crises in the Horn of Africa Using Machine Learning

Abstract In this study, we present a machine‐learning model capable of predicting food insecurity in the Horn of Africa, which is one of the most vulnerable regions worldwide. The region has frequently been affected by severe droughts and food crises over the last several decades, which will likely increase in future. Therefore, exploring novel methods of increasing early warning capabilities is of vital importance to reducing food‐insecurity risk. We present a XGBoost machine‐learning model to predict food‐security crises up to 12 months in advance. We used >20 data sets and the FEWS IPC current‐situation estimates to train the machine‐learning model. Food‐security dynamics were captured effectively by the model up to 3 months in advance ( R 2 > 0.6). Specifically, we predicted 20% of crisis onsets in pastoral regions ( n = 96) and 20%–50% of crisis onsets in agro‐pastoral regions ( n = 22) with a 3‐month lead time. We also compared our 8‐month model predictions to the 8‐month food‐security outlooks produced by FEWS NET. Over a relatively short test period (2019–2022), results suggest the performance of our predictions is similar to FEWS NET for agro‐pastoral and pastoral regions. However, our model is clearly less skilled in predicting food security for crop‐farming regions than FEWS NET. With the well‐established FEWS NET outlooks as a basis, this study highlights the potential for integrating machine‐learning methods into operational systems like FEWS NET.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth s Future
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023ef004211
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Food‐Security Crises in the Horn of Africa Using Machine Learning

Rhoda A. Odongo, Chiem van Straaten, Tim Busker, Marc J. C. Van den Homberg et al.
11 citations
Earth s Future
Agricultural risk and resilience
3.67
article

Predicting Food‐Security Crises in the Horn of Africa Using Machine Learning

Rhoda A. Odongo, Chiem van Straaten, Tim Busker, Marc J. C. Van den Homberg, Bart van den Hurk, Hans de Moel, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we present a machine‐learning model capable of predicting food insecurity in the Horn of Africa, which is one of the most vulnerable regions worldwide. The region has frequently been affected by severe droughts and food crises over the last several decades, which will likely increase in future. Therefore, exploring novel methods of increasing early warning capabilities is of vital importance to reducing food‐insecurity risk. We present a XGBoost machine‐learning model to predict food‐security crises up to 12 months in advance. We used >20 data sets and the FEWS IPC current‐situation estimates to train the machine‐learning model. Food‐security dynamics were captured effectively by the model up to 3 months in advance ( R 2 > 0.6). Specifically, we predicted 20% of crisis onsets in pastoral regions ( n = 96) and 20%–50% of crisis onsets in agro‐pastoral regions ( n = 22) with a 3‐month lead time. We also compared our 8‐month model predictions to the 8‐month food‐security outlooks produced by FEWS NET. Over a relatively short test period (2019–2022), results suggest the performance of our predictions is similar to FEWS NET for agro‐pastoral and pastoral regions. However, our model is clearly less skilled in predicting food security for crop‐farming regions than FEWS NET. With the well‐established FEWS NET outlooks as a basis, this study highlights the potential for integrating machine‐learning methods into operational systems like FEWS NET.

Earth s FutureVol. 12(8)
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (NL), Deltares (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Twente (NL)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Agricultural risk and resilience
3.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.