Immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without radiotherapy in metastatic non‑small cell lung cancer: A meta‑analysis and literature review

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiotherapy has shown promise in the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of combining radiotherapy (RT) ICIs for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC. PubMed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant articles up to February 1, 2023. Post-therapy outcomes such as progression-free survival (PFS), complete response, partial response (PR), progressive disease (PD), stable disease and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. A total of seven studies involving 682 patients were included (384 patients who received ICI + RT vs. RT and 298 patients who received ICI + RT vs. ICI alone). No significant difference in PFS was demonstrated between the ICI + RT group and the RT group (heterogeneity: χ<sup>2</sup>=2.35; df=1; P=0.13; I<sup>2</sup>=57% and test for overall effect: Z=0.10; P=0.92). Conversely, patients in the ICI alone group had significantly decreased PR rates (heterogeneity: Τ<sup>2</sup>=0.00; χ<sup>2</sup>=2.13; df=3; P=0.54; I<sup>2</sup>=0% and test for overall effect: Z=2.57; P=0.01) compared with patients in the ICI + RT group. The ICI + RT group also had significantly lower rates of PD (heterogeneity: Τ<sup>2</sup>=0.00; χ<sup>2</sup>=0.91; df=3; P=0.82; I<sup>2</sup>=0% and test for overall effect: Z=2.52; P=0.01) compared with the ICI alone group. Safety analysis revealed no significant difference between patients who received ICI + RT and those who received RT in terms of grade 1 or 2 AEs. In conclusion, the combination of ICIs + RT demonstrates promising efficacy and safety for patients with metastatic NSCLC. However, clinical trials that have tested this combination are lacking, which emphasizes the need for further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oncology Letters
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2024.14622
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without radiotherapy in metastatic non‑small cell lung cancer: A meta‑analysis and literature review

Isah Adamu Danbala, Mahmud Abdulkadir Magashi, Shengqiao Fu, Xu Wang et al.
1 citations
Oncology Letters
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
0.28
article

Immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without radiotherapy in metastatic non‑small cell lung cancer: A meta‑analysis and literature review

Isah Adamu Danbala, Mahmud Abdulkadir Magashi, Shengqiao Fu, Xu Wang, Wanying Sheng, Haowen Tang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiotherapy has shown promise in the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of combining radiotherapy (RT) ICIs for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC. PubMed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant articles up to February 1, 2023. Post-therapy outcomes such as progression-free survival (PFS), complete response, partial response (PR), progressive disease (PD), stable disease and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. A total of seven studies involving 682 patients were included (384 patients who received ICI + RT vs. RT and 298 patients who received ICI + RT vs. ICI alone). No significant difference in PFS was demonstrated between the ICI + RT group and the RT group (heterogeneity: χ<sup>2</sup>=2.35; df=1; P=0.13; I<sup>2</sup>=57% and test for overall effect: Z=0.10; P=0.92). Conversely, patients in the ICI alone group had significantly decreased PR rates (heterogeneity: Τ<sup>2</sup>=0.00; χ<sup>2</sup>=2.13; df=3; P=0.54; I<sup>2</sup>=0% and test for overall effect: Z=2.57; P=0.01) compared with patients in the ICI + RT group. The ICI + RT group also had significantly lower rates of PD (heterogeneity: Τ<sup>2</sup>=0.00; χ<sup>2</sup>=0.91; df=3; P=0.82; I<sup>2</sup>=0% and test for overall effect: Z=2.52; P=0.01) compared with the ICI alone group. Safety analysis revealed no significant difference between patients who received ICI + RT and those who received RT in terms of grade 1 or 2 AEs. In conclusion, the combination of ICIs + RT demonstrates promising efficacy and safety for patients with metastatic NSCLC. However, clinical trials that have tested this combination are lacking, which emphasizes the need for further research.

Oncology LettersVol. 28(4)
Jiangsu University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.