Exploring climate change discourses on the internet: a topic modeling study across ten years

This study examines online discourses about climate change using automated text analysis. Samples of web contributions from various sources, such as blogs, online newspaper articles, readers' comments, tweets, and others, were collected in 2013, 2019, and 2023. The major themes people talk about when discussing climate change on the internet were identified using structural topic modeling. The study also explored how people discuss climate change differently when using different types of media channels and how the main themes change over time. Six major topics were identified for each point in time; associations between topics and media types were examined. Three topics emerged repeatedly: Dispute over the reality and the implications of climate change, discussions about aspects of the science of climate change, and discussions about causes and consequences of global warming such as sea level rise. In 2019 and 2023, the topic of action (what to do) and the topic of looming disaster showed up repeatedly. Topics limited to one specific corpus were policy discussions, debates about emissions, about renewable energies, about agricultural implications, and expressions of despair. The topical structure could be organized in two general groups, one group containing more science-related topics, and another group containing expressions of dispute, disagreement, and affect. A significant correspondence between media type and prevalent topic could be detected. Media such as Twitter/X and comments are dominated by dispute and despair expressions, whereas media such as blogs and journalistic online articles are primarily concerned with scientific topics in general, as well as with specific topics concerning global warming or renewable energies. In sum, we found noteworthy topical invariances across ten years, and systematic correspondences between topics and media types. The study contributes to the understanding of online discourses about climate change and highlights the role of media type in shaping these discourses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Risk Research
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2024.2387337
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring climate change discourses on the internet: a topic modeling study across ten years

Gisela Böhm, Hans-Rüdiger Pfister
5 citations
Journal of Risk Research
Climate Change Communication and Perception
5.66
article

Exploring climate change discourses on the internet: a topic modeling study across ten years

Gisela Böhm, Hans-Rüdiger Pfister
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This study examines online discourses about climate change using automated text analysis. Samples of web contributions from various sources, such as blogs, online newspaper articles, readers' comments, tweets, and others, were collected in 2013, 2019, and 2023. The major themes people talk about when discussing climate change on the internet were identified using structural topic modeling. The study also explored how people discuss climate change differently when using different types of media channels and how the main themes change over time. Six major topics were identified for each point in time; associations between topics and media types were examined. Three topics emerged repeatedly: Dispute over the reality and the implications of climate change, discussions about aspects of the science of climate change, and discussions about causes and consequences of global warming such as sea level rise. In 2019 and 2023, the topic of action (what to do) and the topic of looming disaster showed up repeatedly. Topics limited to one specific corpus were policy discussions, debates about emissions, about renewable energies, about agricultural implications, and expressions of despair. The topical structure could be organized in two general groups, one group containing more science-related topics, and another group containing expressions of dispute, disagreement, and affect. A significant correspondence between media type and prevalent topic could be detected. Media such as Twitter/X and comments are dominated by dispute and despair expressions, whereas media such as blogs and journalistic online articles are primarily concerned with scientific topics in general, as well as with specific topics concerning global warming or renewable energies. In sum, we found noteworthy topical invariances across ten years, and systematic correspondences between topics and media types. The study contributes to the understanding of online discourses about climate change and highlights the role of media type in shaping these discourses.

Journal of Risk ResearchVol. 28(3-4)
University of Inland Norway (NO), University of Bergen (NO)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
5.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.