Do national innovation projects shape citizens’ public health behaviours?

This article investigates whether, in the context of rising nationalism, drawing attention to national innovation strategies influences public health behaviours, particularly vaccine uptake. It draws on an original two-wave panel study of United Kingdom (UK) respondents during the COVID pandemic. The survey included an experimental design, which primed respondents with a nationalist framing of COVID-19 vaccines, drawing attention to the UK's role in developing the AstraZeneca vaccine and in rapid approval and roll out of other vaccines. Our results show no significant impact of nationalist framing on vaccine willingness, even among those with nationalist or science-skeptical views. These findings suggest public health authorities should be cautious with nationalist framing, as it may be ineffective or counterproductive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare Management Forum
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704241271159
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do national innovation projects shape citizens’ public health behaviours?

Jane Gingrich, Jack Stilgoe, Ben W. Ansell, Martín W. Bauer
1 citations
Healthcare Management Forum
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
0.53
article

Do national innovation projects shape citizens’ public health behaviours?

Jane Gingrich, Jack Stilgoe, Ben W. Ansell, Martín W. Bauer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article investigates whether, in the context of rising nationalism, drawing attention to national innovation strategies influences public health behaviours, particularly vaccine uptake. It draws on an original two-wave panel study of United Kingdom (UK) respondents during the COVID pandemic. The survey included an experimental design, which primed respondents with a nationalist framing of COVID-19 vaccines, drawing attention to the UK's role in developing the AstraZeneca vaccine and in rapid approval and roll out of other vaccines. Our results show no significant impact of nationalist framing on vaccine willingness, even among those with nationalist or science-skeptical views. These findings suggest public health authorities should be cautious with nationalist framing, as it may be ineffective or counterproductive.

Healthcare Management ForumVol. 37(6)
University of Oxford (GB), University College London (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, University of Oxford, John Fell Fund, University of Oxford
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do national innovation projects shape citizens’ public health behaviours? — Jane Gingrich, Jack Stilgoe, et al. · Healthcare Management Forum (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS