Exploring Effects of Food Shaming on Consumers’ Food-Related Attitudes and Behaviors

Objective To compare attitudes and behaviors of American adults who have experienced food shaming versus those who have not. Design This was an online survey of 2003 US adults, followed by an additional 5 one-on-one in-depth interviews, for a total of 2008. Data were collected between September and November 2022. Participants US adults (n = 2008) recruited via commercial research panels. Main Outcome Measures Prevalence of food shaming, and attitudes and behaviors among adults who have experienced food shaming versus those who have not. Analysis χ 2 and analysis of covariance investigating associations between experience with food shaming and food-related attitudes and behaviors, controlling for body mass index where possible. Results Nearly 3 in 10 American adults report that they have experienced food shame. Experiencing food shame correlates with higher guilt and shame, greater likelihood to engage in regimented eating, and more prevalent, as well as negative, emotions around food and imagined interactions with food and nutrition professionals. Conclusions and Implications Food shaming is a phenomenon with wide-reaching impacts on attitudes and behaviors. We expect that this innovative study will inform registered dietitian nutritionists and other health professionals to help people develop healthy, sustainable relationships with food.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrition Today
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/nt.0000000000000696
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Effects of Food Shaming on Consumers’ Food-Related Attitudes and Behaviors

Janet Harris, Hannah Kaplan, Jessica McCullars, Christine Rosenbloom et al.
2 citations
Nutrition Today
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
1.28
article

Exploring Effects of Food Shaming on Consumers’ Food-Related Attitudes and Behaviors

Janet Harris, Hannah Kaplan, Jessica McCullars, Christine Rosenbloom, Jessica Broome
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare attitudes and behaviors of American adults who have experienced food shaming versus those who have not. Design This was an online survey of 2003 US adults, followed by an additional 5 one-on-one in-depth interviews, for a total of 2008. Data were collected between September and November 2022. Participants US adults (n = 2008) recruited via commercial research panels. Main Outcome Measures Prevalence of food shaming, and attitudes and behaviors among adults who have experienced food shaming versus those who have not. Analysis χ 2 and analysis of covariance investigating associations between experience with food shaming and food-related attitudes and behaviors, controlling for body mass index where possible. Results Nearly 3 in 10 American adults report that they have experienced food shame. Experiencing food shame correlates with higher guilt and shame, greater likelihood to engage in regimented eating, and more prevalent, as well as negative, emotions around food and imagined interactions with food and nutrition professionals. Conclusions and Implications Food shaming is a phenomenon with wide-reaching impacts on attitudes and behaviors. We expect that this innovative study will inform registered dietitian nutritionists and other health professionals to help people develop healthy, sustainable relationships with food.

Nutrition TodayVol. 59(5)
Ministry of Justice (GB), Georgia State University (US), Freddie Mac (United States) (US), H.B. Fuller (United States) (US), Analysis Group (United States) (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.