THE MANDATORY NATURE OF A NEW CASE HEARING WHEN A JUDGE IS REPLACED

The author examines the impact of the novelty in the review of court rulings when presented with new or newly discovered circumstances.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Justice of the peace
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-4152-2024-8-35-37
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE MANDATORY NATURE OF A NEW CASE HEARING WHEN A JUDGE IS REPLACED

Eduard I. Averbakh
Justice of the peace
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

THE MANDATORY NATURE OF A NEW CASE HEARING WHEN A JUDGE IS REPLACED

Eduard I. Averbakh
article en

Abstract

The author examines the impact of the novelty in the review of court rulings when presented with new or newly discovered circumstances.

Justice of the peace
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THE MANDATORY NATURE OF A NEW CASE HEARING WHEN A JUDGE IS REPLACED — Eduard I. Averbakh · Justice of the peace (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS