Strategic Defense Against Misinformation: Empirical Findings on Paracrisis Responses

This study provides a comprehensive understanding of how companies address reputational risks posed by the increasing spread of online misinformation. Employing an empirical approach, the research draws on the results of an in-depth longitudinal multiple-case study conducted from 2019 to 2023. The data were collected through media monitoring, social media descriptive analysis, analysis of internal documents and interviews with managers and their colleagues who have experienced misinformation paracrises. The findings reveal the response strategies employed during misinformation paracrises and the factors influencing managers' decisions regarding strategy selection and modification. Key aspects such as breaking points in paracrises, post-paracrisis actions, and the communication goals of companies in defending their reputations are highlighted. The study identifies several effective communication tactics for countering corporate rumors, including deliberate silence, legal actions, debunking, media outreach, humour, and employee management. Additionally, it introduces a decision tree as a practical tool for managers navigating these challenges. This research contributes empirical evidence and an insider perspective, thereby offering practical recommendations through the presentation of lived experiences drawn from five European companies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Strategic Communication
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2024.2382984
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic Defense Against Misinformation: Empirical Findings on Paracrisis Responses

Jindřich Oukropec
3 citations
International Journal of Strategic Communication
Misinformation and Its Impacts
3.40
article

Strategic Defense Against Misinformation: Empirical Findings on Paracrisis Responses

Jindřich Oukropec
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive understanding of how companies address reputational risks posed by the increasing spread of online misinformation. Employing an empirical approach, the research draws on the results of an in-depth longitudinal multiple-case study conducted from 2019 to 2023. The data were collected through media monitoring, social media descriptive analysis, analysis of internal documents and interviews with managers and their colleagues who have experienced misinformation paracrises. The findings reveal the response strategies employed during misinformation paracrises and the factors influencing managers' decisions regarding strategy selection and modification. Key aspects such as breaking points in paracrises, post-paracrisis actions, and the communication goals of companies in defending their reputations are highlighted. The study identifies several effective communication tactics for countering corporate rumors, including deliberate silence, legal actions, debunking, media outreach, humour, and employee management. Additionally, it introduces a decision tree as a practical tool for managers navigating these challenges. This research contributes empirical evidence and an insider perspective, thereby offering practical recommendations through the presentation of lived experiences drawn from five European companies.

International Journal of Strategic CommunicationVol. 19(1)
Charles University (CZ)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.