A WCA-Based Evaluation Approach for Matching Analysis of the Construction Process

Assessing construction process optimization and efficiency is crucial for the industry, yet quantitative methods for comparison are lacking. We propose the process matching degree (PMD) to quantitatively assess construction processes, enhancing efficiency and sustainability. Five primary indicators—regulations, environment, equipment, components, and organization—were identified, each of which were initially weighted equally using the weighted criteria approach (WCA). To refine the assessment, we conducted a questionnaire survey to adjust these weights based on expert feedback. Three sub-indicators were introduced for each primary indicator to increase granularity. The PMD’s operability was verified through two cases study involving BIM-simulated and real construction processes. The light-steel-structure building’s PMD values were 68 and 58 points, and the concrete structure’s PMD was 88.25, respectively, and the reasons for these differences were analyzed. This paper introduces PMD, its evaluation indicators, and calculation method, and verifies its feasibility through cases studies and expert questionnaire surveys, providing a comprehensive PMD research methodology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2024-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082457
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A WCA-Based Evaluation Approach for Matching Analysis of the Construction Process

Minjie Sun, Hongyu Ye, Yinan Gong, Yihan Lv et al.
Buildings
BIM and Construction Integration
article

A WCA-Based Evaluation Approach for Matching Analysis of the Construction Process

Minjie Sun, Hongyu Ye, Yinan Gong, Yihan Lv, Cong Meng, Wensheng Yang, Hong Zhang, Baolin Huang
article en

Abstract

Assessing construction process optimization and efficiency is crucial for the industry, yet quantitative methods for comparison are lacking. We propose the process matching degree (PMD) to quantitatively assess construction processes, enhancing efficiency and sustainability. Five primary indicators—regulations, environment, equipment, components, and organization—were identified, each of which were initially weighted equally using the weighted criteria approach (WCA). To refine the assessment, we conducted a questionnaire survey to adjust these weights based on expert feedback. Three sub-indicators were introduced for each primary indicator to increase granularity. The PMD’s operability was verified through two cases study involving BIM-simulated and real construction processes. The light-steel-structure building’s PMD values were 68 and 58 points, and the concrete structure’s PMD was 88.25, respectively, and the reasons for these differences were analyzed. This paper introduces PMD, its evaluation indicators, and calculation method, and verifies its feasibility through cases studies and expert questionnaire surveys, providing a comprehensive PMD research methodology.

BuildingsVol. 14(8)
Southeast University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
BIM and Construction Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A WCA-Based Evaluation Approach for Matching Analysis of the Construction Process — Minjie Sun, Hongyu Ye, et al. · Buildings (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS