25. Barriers and Facilitators of Proper Gender Identification at Outpatient Surgical Centers Providing Gender-affirming Surgery

OBJECTIVE: Addressing patients with the correct name and pronouns is part of professionalism and common courtesy, and improves trust in the health care system for gender-diverse patients. However, there is little literature evaluating obstacles in this setting to proper identification. We aim to describe baseline data on barriers and facilitators to appropriate name and pronoun use on the day of gender-affirming surgery (GAS) as a step toward quality improvement. METHODS: Administrative, nursing and anesthesia staff providing care for patients who underwent gender-affirming chest surgery at two outpatient surgical centers were administered an online survey. Staff was queried about barriers, facilitators and suggested changes to proper gender identification of patients and tools they use to help prevent misgendering. RESULTS: 120 staff members across two outpatient surgical centers completed this online survey and were included for analysis. Participants primarily worked in the operating room (N=65, 54%) and the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (N=38, 32%). Half of respondents (N=59, 49%) believed the rate of misgendering to be 0-25% and respondents identified episodes of misgendering occurring most frequently in the preoperative area (N=58, 48%). The most common barriers to proper patient gender identification were identifying the patient based on their visual appearance alone (N=11, 9%), lack of experience with correct grammar particularly for they/them identifying patients (N=8, 7%), respondent internal bias and “years of conditioning” (N=7, 6%), and patient day of surgery visitor using the incorrect name and pronouns (N=7, 6%). Although most respondents currently use the electronic health record to prevent misgendering (N=76, 63%), common facilitators and suggested changes for misgendering prevention among respondents were to clearly identify name and pronouns visually with items such as a patient badge, color-coded papers in the pre-operative area, and a white board with name and pronouns written. CONCLUSION: Using online surveys of staff at two outpatient surgical centers, we found that visual cues are the most important barriers and facilitators to proper identification of gender-diverse patients. Although the visual cue of patient appearance did trigger internal bias among respondents, many suggested altering the focus of visual cues towards helpful and congruent identifiers would be beneficial. Our next steps include implementing and evaluating suggested visual systematic workflow modifications and creating educational sessions based on other barriers and facilitators. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Jessica Hsu, MD, PhD; 7500 Challis Rd, Brighton, MI 48116; [email protected]; (734) 998-6022

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gox.0001028280.05771.02
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

25. Barriers and Facilitators of Proper Gender Identification at Outpatient Surgical Centers Providing Gender-affirming Surgery

Jessica Hsu, Megan Lane, A Herman
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

25. Barriers and Facilitators of Proper Gender Identification at Outpatient Surgical Centers Providing Gender-affirming Surgery

Jessica Hsu, Megan Lane, A Herman
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Addressing patients with the correct name and pronouns is part of professionalism and common courtesy, and improves trust in the health care system for gender-diverse patients. However, there is little literature evaluating obstacles in this setting to proper identification. We aim to describe baseline data on barriers and facilitators to appropriate name and pronoun use on the day of gender-affirming surgery (GAS) as a step toward quality improvement. METHODS: Administrative, nursing and anesthesia staff providing care for patients who underwent gender-affirming chest surgery at two outpatient surgical centers were administered an online survey. Staff was queried about barriers, facilitators and suggested changes to proper gender identification of patients and tools they use to help prevent misgendering. RESULTS: 120 staff members across two outpatient surgical centers completed this online survey and were included for analysis. Participants primarily worked in the operating room (N=65, 54%) and the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (N=38, 32%). Half of respondents (N=59, 49%) believed the rate of misgendering to be 0-25% and respondents identified episodes of misgendering occurring most frequently in the preoperative area (N=58, 48%). The most common barriers to proper patient gender identification were identifying the patient based on their visual appearance alone (N=11, 9%), lack of experience with correct grammar particularly for they/them identifying patients (N=8, 7%), respondent internal bias and “years of conditioning” (N=7, 6%), and patient day of surgery visitor using the incorrect name and pronouns (N=7, 6%). Although most respondents currently use the electronic health record to prevent misgendering (N=76, 63%), common facilitators and suggested changes for misgendering prevention among respondents were to clearly identify name and pronouns visually with items such as a patient badge, color-coded papers in the pre-operative area, and a white board with name and pronouns written. CONCLUSION: Using online surveys of staff at two outpatient surgical centers, we found that visual cues are the most important barriers and facilitators to proper identification of gender-diverse patients. Although the visual cue of patient appearance did trigger internal bias among respondents, many suggested altering the focus of visual cues towards helpful and congruent identifiers would be beneficial. Our next steps include implementing and evaluating suggested visual systematic workflow modifications and creating educational sessions based on other barriers and facilitators. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Jessica Hsu, MD, PhD; 7500 Challis Rd, Brighton, MI 48116; [email protected]; (734) 998-6022

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenVol. 12(S7)
University of Michigan (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.