Consumer willingness to pay for emission reduction in air travel: A meta-analysis

Air travel contributes a substantial share of global greenhouse gas emissions and is projected to rise. To reduce emissions, airlines and policymakers must understand consumer preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for reductions. Several studies have been conducted for this purpose, with considerable variation in reported WTP values. This paper undertakes a meta-analysis and qualitative review to better understand the key factors influencing WTP drawn from 31 primary studies. A major finding is that WTP could be more than double for a credible offsetting scheme compared to one lacking credibility. Additionally, framing the offset as “per flight” rather than “per tonne CO 2 ” increases WTP, while there appears to be no differential impact of a voluntary versus mandatory schemes. As expected, WTP increases in income, education, and pro-environmental attitudes. The results yield important insights for the design of effective carbon offsetting schemes, thereby enhancing sustainability of aviation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104347
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer willingness to pay for emission reduction in air travel: A meta-analysis

Gorm Kipperberg, Henrik Lindhjem, Nicole Wendt
10 citations
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Economic and Environmental Valuation
11.29
article

Consumer willingness to pay for emission reduction in air travel: A meta-analysis

Gorm Kipperberg, Henrik Lindhjem, Nicole Wendt
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Air travel contributes a substantial share of global greenhouse gas emissions and is projected to rise. To reduce emissions, airlines and policymakers must understand consumer preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for reductions. Several studies have been conducted for this purpose, with considerable variation in reported WTP values. This paper undertakes a meta-analysis and qualitative review to better understand the key factors influencing WTP drawn from 31 primary studies. A major finding is that WTP could be more than double for a credible offsetting scheme compared to one lacking credibility. Additionally, framing the offset as “per flight” rather than “per tonne CO 2 ” increases WTP, while there appears to be no differential impact of a voluntary versus mandatory schemes. As expected, WTP increases in income, education, and pro-environmental attitudes. The results yield important insights for the design of effective carbon offsetting schemes, thereby enhancing sustainability of aviation.

Transportation Research Part D Transport and EnvironmentVol. 134
Menon Business Economics (Norway) (NO), University of Stavanger (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
11.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.