Advances in mitigating oxygen evolution, phase transformation, and voltage fading in Li/Mn-rich cathode materials via cationic doping and surface modification

The Li/Mn-Rich Li[Li x TM (1- x ) ]O 2 (0 < x ≤ 0.2, transitional metals (TMs) = Ni, Mn, & Co) cathode materials are practical alternatives to the dominant lithium iron phosphate (LFP), nickel‑cobalt‑aluminum (NCA), and Ni-rich NMCs owing to their high practical discharge capacities of ∼250–350 mAh/g at elevated voltages (>4.5 V). However, the Li/Mn-rich chemistry commercialization has been impeded by oxygen (O 2 ) evolution, layered to spinel phase transformation, voltage fading, and electrolyte decomposition during cycling. The activation of the Li 2 MnO 3 component is associated with the irreversible first cycle capacity loss of up to 100 mAh/g. On a positive note, spinel phase formation, O 2 evolution, and voltage fading can be mitigated by cationic doping, surface and electrolyte modification. Doping with Na, Nb, K, and Sn expands the Li-slab space and the a / c lattice parameters for better Li + diffusion while cationic dopants stabilize the TM–O bond, occupy the tetrahedral sites in the TM layer, preventing the formation of tri-vacancies and spinel phases; this enhances the cycling stability and suppresses voltage fading. Surface modification with metal oxides (such as TiO 2 and Y 2 O 3 ), phosphates (Li 3 PO 4 /CePO 4 ) and Li–salts (LiAlF 4 ) mitigate oxygen evolution and HF attack, while electrolyte modification improved the stability of the electrolyte at higher voltages suppressed electrolyte decomposition and contributed to the formation of a stable cathode electrolyte interface. • The synergistic beneficial effects of cationic doping, surface coating, and electrolyte modification are discussed. • Cationic dopants and phosphates/metal oxides/Li-salts-based coatings increase the energy barrier for O 2 evolution. • Cationic dopants and phosphates/metal oxides/Li-salts coating suppress layered to spinel phase formation and voltage decay. • Cationic doping, surface modification, electrolyte modification addresses barriers to commercializing Li/Mn-rich cathodes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Energy Storage
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.113144
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Advancements in Battery Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advances in mitigating oxygen evolution, phase transformation, and voltage fading in Li/Mn-rich cathode materials via cationic doping and surface modification

John Karuga, Thabo T.I. Nkambule, Mesfin Abayneh Kebede, Xolile Godfrey Fuku et al.
12 citations
Journal of Energy Storage
Advancements in Battery Materials
2.50
article

Advances in mitigating oxygen evolution, phase transformation, and voltage fading in Li/Mn-rich cathode materials via cationic doping and surface modification

John Karuga, Thabo T.I. Nkambule, Mesfin Abayneh Kebede, Xolile Godfrey Fuku, Bhekie B. Mamba
article en
12 citations

Abstract

The Li/Mn-Rich Li[Li x TM (1- x ) ]O 2 (0 < x ≤ 0.2, transitional metals (TMs) = Ni, Mn, & Co) cathode materials are practical alternatives to the dominant lithium iron phosphate (LFP), nickel‑cobalt‑aluminum (NCA), and Ni-rich NMCs owing to their high practical discharge capacities of ∼250–350 mAh/g at elevated voltages (>4.5 V). However, the Li/Mn-rich chemistry commercialization has been impeded by oxygen (O 2 ) evolution, layered to spinel phase transformation, voltage fading, and electrolyte decomposition during cycling. The activation of the Li 2 MnO 3 component is associated with the irreversible first cycle capacity loss of up to 100 mAh/g. On a positive note, spinel phase formation, O 2 evolution, and voltage fading can be mitigated by cationic doping, surface and electrolyte modification. Doping with Na, Nb, K, and Sn expands the Li-slab space and the a / c lattice parameters for better Li + diffusion while cationic dopants stabilize the TM–O bond, occupy the tetrahedral sites in the TM layer, preventing the formation of tri-vacancies and spinel phases; this enhances the cycling stability and suppresses voltage fading. Surface modification with metal oxides (such as TiO 2 and Y 2 O 3 ), phosphates (Li 3 PO 4 /CePO 4 ) and Li–salts (LiAlF 4 ) mitigate oxygen evolution and HF attack, while electrolyte modification improved the stability of the electrolyte at higher voltages suppressed electrolyte decomposition and contributed to the formation of a stable cathode electrolyte interface. • The synergistic beneficial effects of cationic doping, surface coating, and electrolyte modification are discussed. • Cationic dopants and phosphates/metal oxides/Li-salts-based coatings increase the energy barrier for O 2 evolution. • Cationic dopants and phosphates/metal oxides/Li-salts coating suppress layered to spinel phase formation and voltage decay. • Cationic doping, surface modification, electrolyte modification addresses barriers to commercializing Li/Mn-rich cathodes.

Journal of Energy StorageVol. 98
University of South Africa (ZA)
University of South Africa
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Advancements in Battery Materials
2.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.