The effect of ATLS/PHTLS spinal motion restriction protocol on the incidence of spinal cord injury, a nationwide database study
Since implementation of the SMR-protocol was aiming to limit TSCI in patients who suffered a spinal fracture, the increase in TSCI is an unexpected finding. Exact explanation for this increase is unclear and the contribution of the SMR-protocol is not fully understood due to confounders in the used datasets. Either way, the scientific evidence supporting this costly time- and labor-intensive SMR-protocol remains debated, along with evidence contradicting it. Therefore it stresses the need for clear, evidencebased reasoning for spinal immobilization according to ATLS, as this is currently lacking.
Authors
- M.J.M. Panneman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5569-3188)
- Femke Nawijn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8390-4483)
- J. Carel Goslings (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3942-0304)
- Sylvester R. Groen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8599-8014)
- Joost G. ten Brinke
- Tijmen W. Kraai
- Mike Hogervorst
Institutions
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
- Gelre Hospitals (NL)
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Rijnstate Hospital (NL)
- VeiligheidNL (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Spine Journal
- Published
- 2024-08-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08421-4
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Spinal Cord Injury Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.27