Establishing the importance of co-creation and self-efficacy in creative collaboration with artificial intelligence

The emergence of generative AI technologies has led to an increasing number of people collaborating with AI to produce creative works. Across two experimental studies, in which we carefully designed and programmed state-of-the-art human-AI interfaces, we examine how the design of generative AI systems influences human creativity (poetry writing). First, we find that people were most creative when writing a poem on their own, compared to first receiving a poem generated by an AI system and using sophisticated tools to edit it (Study 1). Following this, we demonstrate that this creativity deficit dissipates when people co-create with-not edit-AI and establish creative self-efficacy as an important mechanism in this process (Study 2). Thus, our findings indicate that people must occupy the role of a co-creator, not an editor, to reap the benefits of generative AI in the production of creative works.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69423-2
Citations
70
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishing the importance of co-creation and self-efficacy in creative collaboration with artificial intelligence

Jack McGuire, David De Cremer, Tim Van de Cruys
70 citations
Scientific Reports
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
35.53
article

Establishing the importance of co-creation and self-efficacy in creative collaboration with artificial intelligence

Jack McGuire, David De Cremer, Tim Van de Cruys
article en
70 citations

Abstract

The emergence of generative AI technologies has led to an increasing number of people collaborating with AI to produce creative works. Across two experimental studies, in which we carefully designed and programmed state-of-the-art human-AI interfaces, we examine how the design of generative AI systems influences human creativity (poetry writing). First, we find that people were most creative when writing a poem on their own, compared to first receiving a poem generated by an AI system and using sophisticated tools to edit it (Study 1). Following this, we demonstrate that this creativity deficit dissipates when people co-create with-not edit-AI and establish creative self-efficacy as an important mechanism in this process (Study 2). Thus, our findings indicate that people must occupy the role of a co-creator, not an editor, to reap the benefits of generative AI in the production of creative works.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Northeastern University (US), National University of Singapore (SG), KU Leuven (BE)
Ministry of Education - Singapore
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
35.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Establishing the importance of co-creation and self-efficacy in creative collaboration with artificial intelligence — Jack McGuire, David De Cremer, et al. · Scientific Reports (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS