What Could (Or Should) Be the Regulatory Response to the Wicked Problem of Climate Change?

. Sociologists define “wicked problems” as issues confronting humanity that have no clear right answer or perspective. The issue of climate change is a wicked problem of our age—and an issue that few regulators have explicitly addressed within their remit. The polluting effects of health care work itself have recently been highlighted as a call to action within health professions to address climate change issues more forcefully. Perspectives on how and why regulators should—or should not—prioritize climate change in their activities can be difficult to articulate. An approach to this issue that focuses on appropriate and proportionate use of regulatory levers is essential. Processes to allow for greater transparency in discussions, decision making, and strategic plan development are important for regulators to consider. While regulatory bodies vary in their statutory ability or organizational capacity to lead or address climate change directly within their profession, opportunities may exist to partner with other groups to develop evidence-informed options for practitioners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Regulation
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30770/2572-1852-110.2.7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Could (Or Should) Be the Regulatory Response to the Wicked Problem of Climate Change?

Zubin Austin, Aly Háji
1 citations
Journal of Medical Regulation
Climate Change Policy and Economics
1.13
article

What Could (Or Should) Be the Regulatory Response to the Wicked Problem of Climate Change?

Zubin Austin, Aly Háji
article en
1 citations

Abstract

. Sociologists define “wicked problems” as issues confronting humanity that have no clear right answer or perspective. The issue of climate change is a wicked problem of our age—and an issue that few regulators have explicitly addressed within their remit. The polluting effects of health care work itself have recently been highlighted as a call to action within health professions to address climate change issues more forcefully. Perspectives on how and why regulators should—or should not—prioritize climate change in their activities can be difficult to articulate. An approach to this issue that focuses on appropriate and proportionate use of regulatory levers is essential. Processes to allow for greater transparency in discussions, decision making, and strategic plan development are important for regulators to consider. While regulatory bodies vary in their statutory ability or organizational capacity to lead or address climate change directly within their profession, opportunities may exist to partner with other groups to develop evidence-informed options for practitioners.

Journal of Medical RegulationVol. 110(2)
University of Toronto (CA), TD Bank Group (CA), Institute for Work & Health (CA)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What Could (Or Should) Be the Regulatory Response to the Wicked Problem of Climate Change? — Zubin Austin, Aly Háji · Journal of Medical Regulation (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS