An Evaluation of the Replacement of Animal-derived Biomaterials in Human Primary Cell Culture

The likelihood that potential new drugs will successfully navigate the current translational pipeline is poor, with fewer than 10% of drug candidates making this transition successfully, even after their entry into clinical trials. Prior to this stage, candidate drugs are typically evaluated by using models of increasing complexity, beginning with basic <i>in vitro</i> cell culture studies and progressing through to animal studies, where many of these candidates are lost due to lack of efficacy or toxicology concerns. There are many reasons for this poor translation, but interspecies differences in functional and physiological parameters undoubtedly contribute to the problem. Improving the human-relevance of early preclinical <i>in vitro</i> models may help translatability, especially when targeting more nuanced species-specific cell processes. The aim of the current study was to define a set of guidelines for the effective transition of human primary cells of multiple lineages to more physiologically relevant, translatable, animal-free <i>in vitro</i> culture conditions. Animal-derived biomaterials (ADBs) were systematically replaced with non-animal-derived alternatives in the <i>in vitro</i> cell culture systems, and the impact of the substitutions subsequently assessed by comparing the kinetics and phenotypes of the cultured cells. ADBs were successfully eliminated from primary human dermal fibroblast, uterine fibroblast, pulmonary fibroblast, retinal endothelial cell and peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture systems, and the individual requirements of each cell subtype were defined to ensure the successful transition toward growth under animal-free culture conditions. We demonstrate that it is possible to transition ('humanise') a diverse set of human primary cell types by following a set of simple overarching principles that inform the selection, and guide the evaluation of new, improved, human-relevant <i>in vitro</i> culture conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929241269004
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Evaluation of the Replacement of Animal-derived Biomaterials in Human Primary Cell Culture

Laura R. Bramwell, Lorna W. Harries, S. J. GOULD, Merlin Davies et al.
3 citations
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
0.70
article

An Evaluation of the Replacement of Animal-derived Biomaterials in Human Primary Cell Culture

Laura R. Bramwell, Lorna W. Harries, S. J. GOULD, Merlin Davies, Conor McMullan, Emily C. Trusler
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The likelihood that potential new drugs will successfully navigate the current translational pipeline is poor, with fewer than 10% of drug candidates making this transition successfully, even after their entry into clinical trials. Prior to this stage, candidate drugs are typically evaluated by using models of increasing complexity, beginning with basic <i>in vitro</i> cell culture studies and progressing through to animal studies, where many of these candidates are lost due to lack of efficacy or toxicology concerns. There are many reasons for this poor translation, but interspecies differences in functional and physiological parameters undoubtedly contribute to the problem. Improving the human-relevance of early preclinical <i>in vitro</i> models may help translatability, especially when targeting more nuanced species-specific cell processes. The aim of the current study was to define a set of guidelines for the effective transition of human primary cells of multiple lineages to more physiologically relevant, translatable, animal-free <i>in vitro</i> culture conditions. Animal-derived biomaterials (ADBs) were systematically replaced with non-animal-derived alternatives in the <i>in vitro</i> cell culture systems, and the impact of the substitutions subsequently assessed by comparing the kinetics and phenotypes of the cultured cells. ADBs were successfully eliminated from primary human dermal fibroblast, uterine fibroblast, pulmonary fibroblast, retinal endothelial cell and peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture systems, and the individual requirements of each cell subtype were defined to ensure the successful transition toward growth under animal-free culture conditions. We demonstrate that it is possible to transition ('humanise') a diverse set of human primary cell types by following a set of simple overarching principles that inform the selection, and guide the evaluation of new, improved, human-relevant <i>in vitro</i> culture conditions.

Alternatives to Laboratory AnimalsVol. 52(5)
University of Exeter (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Animal Free Research UK
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
0.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.