Evaluating accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT responses to patient-based questions in Ophthalmology: An observational study

Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is an online large language model that appears to be a popular source of health information, as it can provide patients with answers in the form of human-like text, although the accuracy and safety of its responses are not evident. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT responses to patients-based questions in ophthalmology. We collected 150 questions from the "Ask an ophthalmologist" page of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, which were reviewed and refined by two ophthalmologists for their eligibility. Each question was inputted into ChatGPT twice using the "new chat" option. The grading scale included the following: (1) comprehensive, (2) correct but inadequate, (3) some correct and some incorrect, and (4) completely incorrect. Totally, 117 questions were inputted into ChatGPT, which provided "comprehensive" responses to 70/117 (59.8%) of questions. Concerning reproducibility, it was defined as no difference in grading categories (1 and 2 vs 3 and 4) between the 2 responses for each question. ChatGPT provided reproducible responses to 91.5% of questions. This study shows moderate accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT responses to patients' questions in ophthalmology. ChatGPT may be-after more modifications-a supplementary health information source, which should be used as an adjunct, but not a substitute, to medical advice. The reliability of ChatGPT should undergo more investigations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000039120
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT responses to patient-based questions in Ophthalmology: An observational study

Zaina Alnajjar, Ibrahim Ayasrah, Asem Alqudah, Mohammed Baker et al.
16 citations
Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.92
article

Evaluating accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT responses to patient-based questions in Ophthalmology: An observational study

Zaina Alnajjar, Ibrahim Ayasrah, Asem Alqudah, Mohammed Baker, Mohammad Al Salkhadi, Yaqoot Ta’ani, Shaima’a Aljawarneh, Abdelwahab Aleshawi
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is an online large language model that appears to be a popular source of health information, as it can provide patients with answers in the form of human-like text, although the accuracy and safety of its responses are not evident. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT responses to patients-based questions in ophthalmology. We collected 150 questions from the "Ask an ophthalmologist" page of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, which were reviewed and refined by two ophthalmologists for their eligibility. Each question was inputted into ChatGPT twice using the "new chat" option. The grading scale included the following: (1) comprehensive, (2) correct but inadequate, (3) some correct and some incorrect, and (4) completely incorrect. Totally, 117 questions were inputted into ChatGPT, which provided "comprehensive" responses to 70/117 (59.8%) of questions. Concerning reproducibility, it was defined as no difference in grading categories (1 and 2 vs 3 and 4) between the 2 responses for each question. ChatGPT provided reproducible responses to 91.5% of questions. This study shows moderate accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT responses to patients' questions in ophthalmology. ChatGPT may be-after more modifications-a supplementary health information source, which should be used as an adjunct, but not a substitute, to medical advice. The reliability of ChatGPT should undergo more investigations.

MedicineVol. 103(32)
Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), Hashemite University (JO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.