E-tailer’s Inventory Location and Pricing With Strategic Consumers

This research examines how strategic consumer behavior influences e-tailers’ decisions on inventory storage locations, pricing strategies, and inventory levels. The e-tailer opts for either a single central warehouse, which has lower holding but higher shipping costs due to its distance from consumers, or a mix of central and proximal local warehouses, which reduces shipping costs but incurs higher holding costs. We find that local warehousing prompts consumers to delay purchases in hopes of discounts, compelling e-tailers to lower prices to encourage early buying. Consequently, the firm may not utilize the local warehouse, even when it comes at no cost. Intriguingly, we find that increased local storage expenses or diminished product durability could paradoxically elevate firm profits. Our numerical analysis highlights the benefits of strategically distributing inventory across both central and local warehouses, especially under conditions of reduced demand uncertainty. Moreover, we establish that our key insights persist in the case of multiple local warehouses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Production and Operations Management
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478241274644
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

E-tailer’s Inventory Location and Pricing With Strategic Consumers

Yuxin Chen, Meng Li, Chao Liang
5 citations
Production and Operations Management
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
2.64
article

E-tailer’s Inventory Location and Pricing With Strategic Consumers

Yuxin Chen, Meng Li, Chao Liang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This research examines how strategic consumer behavior influences e-tailers’ decisions on inventory storage locations, pricing strategies, and inventory levels. The e-tailer opts for either a single central warehouse, which has lower holding but higher shipping costs due to its distance from consumers, or a mix of central and proximal local warehouses, which reduces shipping costs but incurs higher holding costs. We find that local warehousing prompts consumers to delay purchases in hopes of discounts, compelling e-tailers to lower prices to encourage early buying. Consequently, the firm may not utilize the local warehouse, even when it comes at no cost. Intriguingly, we find that increased local storage expenses or diminished product durability could paradoxically elevate firm profits. Our numerical analysis highlights the benefits of strategically distributing inventory across both central and local warehouses, especially under conditions of reduced demand uncertainty. Moreover, we establish that our key insights persist in the case of multiple local warehouses.

Production and Operations ManagementVol. 34(1)
New York University Shanghai (CN), University of Houston (US), China Europe International Business School (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
2.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

E-tailer’s Inventory Location and Pricing With Strategic Consumers — Yuxin Chen, Meng Li, et al. · Production and Operations Management (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS