Vascular tissues bioprinted with smooth muscle cell-only bioinks in support baths mimic features of native coronary arteries

This study explores the bioprinting of a smooth muscle cell-only bioink into ionically crosslinked oxidized methacrylated alginate (OMA) microgel baths to create self-supporting vascular tissues. The impact of OMA microgel support bath methacrylation degree and cell-only bioink dispensing parameters on tissue formation, remodeling, structure and strength was investigated. We hypothesized that reducing dispensing tip diameter from 27 G (210<i>μ</i>m) to 30 G (159<i>μ</i>m) for cell-only bioink dispensing would reduce tissue wall thickness and improve the consistency of tissue dimensions while maintaining cell viability. Printing with 30 G tips resulted in decreased mean wall thickness (318.6<i>μ</i>m) without compromising mean cell viability (94.8%). Histological analysis of cell-only smooth muscle tissues cultured for 14 d in OMA support baths exhibited decreased wall thickness using 30 G dispensing tips, which correlated with increased collagen deposition and alignment. In addition, a TUNEL assay indicated a decrease in cell death in tissues printed with thinner (30 G) dispensing tips. Mechanical testing demonstrated that tissues printed with a 30 G dispensing tip exhibit an increase in ultimate tensile strength compared to those printed with a 27 G dispensing tip. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of precise control over bioprinting parameters to generate mechanically robust tissues when using cell-only bioinks dispensed and cultured within hydrogel support baths. The ability to control print dimensions using cell-only bioinks may enable bioprinting of more complex soft tissue geometries to generate<i>in vitro</i>tissue models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biofabrication
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ad6d8f
Citations
6
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vascular tissues bioprinted with smooth muscle cell-only bioinks in support baths mimic features of native coronary arteries

William DeMaria, Marsha W. Rolle, Oju Jeon, Derrick Wells et al.
6 citations
Biofabrication
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
1.11
article

Vascular tissues bioprinted with smooth muscle cell-only bioinks in support baths mimic features of native coronary arteries

William DeMaria, Marsha W. Rolle, Oju Jeon, Derrick Wells, Eben Alsberg, Andre E. Figueroa Milla
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study explores the bioprinting of a smooth muscle cell-only bioink into ionically crosslinked oxidized methacrylated alginate (OMA) microgel baths to create self-supporting vascular tissues. The impact of OMA microgel support bath methacrylation degree and cell-only bioink dispensing parameters on tissue formation, remodeling, structure and strength was investigated. We hypothesized that reducing dispensing tip diameter from 27 G (210<i>μ</i>m) to 30 G (159<i>μ</i>m) for cell-only bioink dispensing would reduce tissue wall thickness and improve the consistency of tissue dimensions while maintaining cell viability. Printing with 30 G tips resulted in decreased mean wall thickness (318.6<i>μ</i>m) without compromising mean cell viability (94.8%). Histological analysis of cell-only smooth muscle tissues cultured for 14 d in OMA support baths exhibited decreased wall thickness using 30 G dispensing tips, which correlated with increased collagen deposition and alignment. In addition, a TUNEL assay indicated a decrease in cell death in tissues printed with thinner (30 G) dispensing tips. Mechanical testing demonstrated that tissues printed with a 30 G dispensing tip exhibit an increase in ultimate tensile strength compared to those printed with a 27 G dispensing tip. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of precise control over bioprinting parameters to generate mechanically robust tissues when using cell-only bioinks dispensed and cultured within hydrogel support baths. The ability to control print dimensions using cell-only bioinks may enable bioprinting of more complex soft tissue geometries to generate<i>in vitro</i>tissue models.

BiofabricationVol. 16(4)
Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US), Northeastern University (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Jesse Brown VA Medical Center (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.