Analysis of motivational profiles of physical activity behavior in primary school students: A self-determination theory-based perspective

Grounded on Self-Determination Theory, the objective of this research was to identify the optimal number of motivational profiles, and to examine how they could differ in long-term physical activity behavior (physical activity intention, physical activity levels, and physical activity recommendations). This is a longitudinal study which data were collected at three points in time: March (Time 0), June (Time 1) and October (Time 2). At Time 0, a total of 535 Spanish students aged 10 to 12 years ( Mage = 10.50, SD = 0.52 years, 47 % girls) participated in this study. Results from latent profile analysis revealed five motivational profiles (“highly amotivated”, “moderately amotivated”, “averagely motivated”, “controlled motivated”, and “autonomously motivated”). In the short-term and long-term, the “highly amotivated”, “moderately amotivated”, and “averagely motivated” profiles were the least adaptive, while the “controlled motivated” and “autonomously motivated” profiles were the most adaptive for physical activity behavior. In the short term, no differences were found between the “controlled motivated” profile and the “autonomously motivated” profile, while in the long term, the “autonomously motivated” profile was more adaptive towards physical activity behavior than the “controlled motivated” profile. The results suggest that students with autonomous motivation maintain greater long-term intentions to engage in physical activity compared to those with controlled motivation and amotivated students. These findings reinforce the importance of promoting children's autonomous motivation, as it seems to be more effective in maintaining physical activity behavior over time. Therefore, it is important for socializing agents to foster positive experiences based on fun and enjoyment towards physical activity to promote children's interest in physical activity conduct and develop other life-long, health-related behaviors. • A total of five distinct motivational profiles were identified. • The “controlled motivated” profile was associated with PA behavior over long term. • Long-term, the “autonomously motivated” profile was associated PA behaviors. • Short-term, the “autonomously motivated” profile was the most adaptive towards PA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Individual Differences
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112837
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of motivational profiles of physical activity behavior in primary school students: A self-determination theory-based perspective

Pedro Antonio Sánchez Miguel, Rubén Llanos-Muñoz, Miguel A. López‐Gajardo, Rafael Burgueño et al.
5 citations
Personality and Individual Differences
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
3.22
article

Analysis of motivational profiles of physical activity behavior in primary school students: A self-determination theory-based perspective

Pedro Antonio Sánchez Miguel, Rubén Llanos-Muñoz, Miguel A. López‐Gajardo, Rafael Burgueño, Miguel Ángel Tapia‐Serrano
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Grounded on Self-Determination Theory, the objective of this research was to identify the optimal number of motivational profiles, and to examine how they could differ in long-term physical activity behavior (physical activity intention, physical activity levels, and physical activity recommendations). This is a longitudinal study which data were collected at three points in time: March (Time 0), June (Time 1) and October (Time 2). At Time 0, a total of 535 Spanish students aged 10 to 12 years ( Mage = 10.50, SD = 0.52 years, 47 % girls) participated in this study. Results from latent profile analysis revealed five motivational profiles (“highly amotivated”, “moderately amotivated”, “averagely motivated”, “controlled motivated”, and “autonomously motivated”). In the short-term and long-term, the “highly amotivated”, “moderately amotivated”, and “averagely motivated” profiles were the least adaptive, while the “controlled motivated” and “autonomously motivated” profiles were the most adaptive for physical activity behavior. In the short term, no differences were found between the “controlled motivated” profile and the “autonomously motivated” profile, while in the long term, the “autonomously motivated” profile was more adaptive towards physical activity behavior than the “controlled motivated” profile. The results suggest that students with autonomous motivation maintain greater long-term intentions to engage in physical activity compared to those with controlled motivation and amotivated students. These findings reinforce the importance of promoting children's autonomous motivation, as it seems to be more effective in maintaining physical activity behavior over time. Therefore, it is important for socializing agents to foster positive experiences based on fun and enjoyment towards physical activity to promote children's interest in physical activity conduct and develop other life-long, health-related behaviors. • A total of five distinct motivational profiles were identified. • The “controlled motivated” profile was associated with PA behavior over long term. • Long-term, the “autonomously motivated” profile was associated PA behaviors. • Short-term, the “autonomously motivated” profile was the most adaptive towards PA.

Personality and Individual DifferencesVol. 231
Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Universidad de Extremadura (ES), Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y de Cooperación, Universidad de Extremadura
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.