The characteristics of users of an online screening tool for children and adolescents with intellectual disability and of those being screened

Screening tools can help with the identification of intellectual disability, but little is known about who uses them. This study analysed anonymous information from 2691 users of an evidence-based, online, intellectual disability screening questionnaire for children and adolescents (CAIDS-Q) to explore the characteristics of the users and of those being screened. The users were split almost equally between parents/family members (48.6%) and professionals (49.9%), with the majority (63.8%) of the latter group being health staff. Significant differences in the characteristics of the children being screened were found, according to whether the user was a parent/family member or a professional, with the overall pattern suggesting that professionals screened children with greater complexity of needs, but about whom less was known. The screened children had a range of areas of difficulties that are common to those with intellectual disability. Implications for practice are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intellectual Disabilities
Published
2024-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295241272698
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Family and Disability Support Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The characteristics of users of an online screening tool for children and adolescents with intellectual disability and of those being screened

Aja Louise Murray, Judith Thompson, Karen Horridge, Karen McKenzie et al.
1 citations
Journal of Intellectual Disabilities
Family and Disability Support Research
0.64
article

The characteristics of users of an online screening tool for children and adolescents with intellectual disability and of those being screened

Aja Louise Murray, Judith Thompson, Karen Horridge, Karen McKenzie, Kara Murray, Kirsty Greenwell
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Screening tools can help with the identification of intellectual disability, but little is known about who uses them. This study analysed anonymous information from 2691 users of an evidence-based, online, intellectual disability screening questionnaire for children and adolescents (CAIDS-Q) to explore the characteristics of the users and of those being screened. The users were split almost equally between parents/family members (48.6%) and professionals (49.9%), with the majority (63.8%) of the latter group being health staff. Significant differences in the characteristics of the children being screened were found, according to whether the user was a parent/family member or a professional, with the overall pattern suggesting that professionals screened children with greater complexity of needs, but about whom less was known. The screened children had a range of areas of difficulties that are common to those with intellectual disability. Implications for practice are discussed.

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities
NHS Lothian (GB), Northumbria University (GB), University of Sunderland (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Family and Disability Support Research
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The characteristics of users of an online screening tool for children and adolescents with intellectual disability and of those being screened — Aja Louise Murray, Judith Thompson, et al. · Journal of Intellectual Disabilities (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS