Force re-development after shortening reveals a role for titin in stretch–shortening performance enhancement in skinned muscle fibres

Stretch-shortening cycles (SSCs) involve muscle lengthening (eccentric contractions) instantly followed by shortening (concentric contractions). This combination enhances force, work and power output compared with pure shortening contractions, which is known as the SSC effect. Recent evidence indicates both cross-bridge (XB)-based and non-XB-based (e.g. titin) structures contribute to this effect. This study analysed force re-development following SSCs and pure shortening contractions to gain further insight into the roles of XB and non-XB structures regarding the SSC effect. Experiments were conducted on rat soleus muscle fibres (n=16) with different SSC velocities (30%, 60% and 85% of maximum shortening velocity) and constant stretch-shortening magnitudes (18% of optimum length). The XB inhibitor blebbistatin was used to distinguish between XB and non-XB contributions to force generation. The results showed SSCs led to significantly greater [mean±s.d. 1.02±0.15 versus 0.68±0.09 (ΔF/Δt); t62=8.61, P<0.001, d=2.79) and faster (75 ms versus 205 ms; t62=-6.37, P<0.001, d=-1.48) force re-development compared with pure shortening contractions in the control treatment. In the blebbistatin treatment, SSCs still resulted in greater [0.11±0.03 versus 0.06±0.01 (ΔF/Δt); t62=8.00, P<0.001, d=2.24) and faster (3010±1631 versus 7916±3230 ms; t62=-8.00, P<0.001, d=-1.92) force re-development compared with pure shortening contractions. These findings deepen our understanding of the SSC effect, underscoring the involvement of non-XB structures such as titin in modulating force production. This modulation is likely to involve complex mechanosensory coupling from stretch to signal transmission during muscle contraction.