Examining the Interplay of Hydrolysed Polyacrylamide and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate on Emulsion Stability: Insights from Turbiscan and Electrocoalescence Studies

Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is utilized in the oil and gas production industry to extract additional oil from underground reservoirs. In chemically enhanced oil recovery, surfactant and polymeric water are injected separately or in a mixture. Injected fluids can form stable emulsions during oil production. This surfactant, polymer-loaded water-in-oil emulsion, must be separated to treat crude oil and avoid any corrosion or deactivation of catalysts in the refinery. An electrocoalecer technique is utilized to separate the water from the emulsion under the application of an electric field. To improve the efficiency of the EOR and electrocoalescers, it is essential to investigate the impact of surfactants, polymers, and their mixture interaction. In this study, the effects of surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)), polymer (hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM)), and their mixture with a wide range of concentrations were analyzed using turbiscan, bottle electrocoalecer, interfacial tension (IFT), and conductivity. Our study shows that when SDS was used independently, the viscosity of the dispersed phase did not change. Surprisingly, when SDS was combined with HPAM, the overall viscosity of the dispersed phase mixture decreased. HPAM and SDS contribute to an increase in the conductivity of the dispersed phase. Conductivity, IFT, and viscosity are critical factors in studying electrocoalescence. Our detailed study found that SDS is the primary factor in stabilizing the emulsion compared to HPAM using turbiscan. The electrocoalecer study shows that in the case of a deionized water-based emulsion, the separation efficiency is 98% in 10 min. In contrast, a mixture of HPAM polymer with a concentration of 2000 ppm and SDS with a concentration of 5000 ppm stabilized emulsion shows 84% separation in 10 min. The outcome of this study helps design the electrocoalescer for separating complex water-in-oil emulsion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Langmuir
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c02115
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Interplay of Hydrolysed Polyacrylamide and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate on Emulsion Stability: Insights from Turbiscan and Electrocoalescence Studies

Vikky Anand, Rahul Painuly
15 citations
Langmuir
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
5.04
article

Examining the Interplay of Hydrolysed Polyacrylamide and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate on Emulsion Stability: Insights from Turbiscan and Electrocoalescence Studies

Vikky Anand, Rahul Painuly
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is utilized in the oil and gas production industry to extract additional oil from underground reservoirs. In chemically enhanced oil recovery, surfactant and polymeric water are injected separately or in a mixture. Injected fluids can form stable emulsions during oil production. This surfactant, polymer-loaded water-in-oil emulsion, must be separated to treat crude oil and avoid any corrosion or deactivation of catalysts in the refinery. An electrocoalecer technique is utilized to separate the water from the emulsion under the application of an electric field. To improve the efficiency of the EOR and electrocoalescers, it is essential to investigate the impact of surfactants, polymers, and their mixture interaction. In this study, the effects of surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)), polymer (hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM)), and their mixture with a wide range of concentrations were analyzed using turbiscan, bottle electrocoalecer, interfacial tension (IFT), and conductivity. Our study shows that when SDS was used independently, the viscosity of the dispersed phase did not change. Surprisingly, when SDS was combined with HPAM, the overall viscosity of the dispersed phase mixture decreased. HPAM and SDS contribute to an increase in the conductivity of the dispersed phase. Conductivity, IFT, and viscosity are critical factors in studying electrocoalescence. Our detailed study found that SDS is the primary factor in stabilizing the emulsion compared to HPAM using turbiscan. The electrocoalecer study shows that in the case of a deionized water-based emulsion, the separation efficiency is 98% in 10 min. In contrast, a mixture of HPAM polymer with a concentration of 2000 ppm and SDS with a concentration of 5000 ppm stabilized emulsion shows 84% separation in 10 min. The outcome of this study helps design the electrocoalescer for separating complex water-in-oil emulsion.

LangmuirVol. 40(33)
Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur (IN)
Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Science and Engineering Research Board
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
5.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.