Flexural Behavior of Galvanized Iron Based Cold-Formed Steel Back-to-Back Built-Up Beams at Elevated Temperatures

Cold-formed steel (CFS) sections have become popular in construction due to several advantages over structural steel. However, research on the performance of galvanized iron (GI)-based CFS under high temperatures, especially regarding its flexural behavior, has been limited. This study extensively investigates how GI-based CFS beams with varying spans behave under elevated temperatures and subsequent cooling using air and water. This study examines the impact of temperature loading and compares the effectiveness of air- and water-cooling methods. Experimental results are validated and analyzed alongside findings from finite element modeling (FEM) using ABAQUS (2019_09_13-23.19.31) and the Direct Strength Method (DSM). Additionally, this study conducts a parametric investigation to assess how beam span influences flexural capacity. Among beams heated to the same temperature, those cooled with water show slightly lower load capacities compared to those cooled with air. The highest load capacity observed is 64.3 kN for the reference specimen, while the lowest is 26.2 kN for the specimen heated for 90 min and cooled with water, a 59.27% difference between them. Stiffness decreases as heating duration increases, with the reference section exhibiting significantly higher stiffness compared to the section heated for 90 min and cooled with water, with a 92.76% difference in stiffness. As heating duration increases, ductility also increases. Various failure modes are observed based on different heating and cooling conditions across different beam spans. This study provides insights into how GI-based CFS beams perform under temperature stress and different cooling scenarios, contributing valuable data for structural design and safety considerations in construction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2024-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082456
Citations
28
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flexural Behavior of Galvanized Iron Based Cold-Formed Steel Back-to-Back Built-Up Beams at Elevated Temperatures

A. Diana Andrushia, G. Beulah Gnana Ananthi, Anand Nammalvar, Varun Sabu Sam et al.
28 citations
Buildings
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
7.31
article

Flexural Behavior of Galvanized Iron Based Cold-Formed Steel Back-to-Back Built-Up Beams at Elevated Temperatures

A. Diana Andrushia, G. Beulah Gnana Ananthi, Anand Nammalvar, Varun Sabu Sam, Krishanu Roy
article en
28 citations

Abstract

Cold-formed steel (CFS) sections have become popular in construction due to several advantages over structural steel. However, research on the performance of galvanized iron (GI)-based CFS under high temperatures, especially regarding its flexural behavior, has been limited. This study extensively investigates how GI-based CFS beams with varying spans behave under elevated temperatures and subsequent cooling using air and water. This study examines the impact of temperature loading and compares the effectiveness of air- and water-cooling methods. Experimental results are validated and analyzed alongside findings from finite element modeling (FEM) using ABAQUS (2019_09_13-23.19.31) and the Direct Strength Method (DSM). Additionally, this study conducts a parametric investigation to assess how beam span influences flexural capacity. Among beams heated to the same temperature, those cooled with water show slightly lower load capacities compared to those cooled with air. The highest load capacity observed is 64.3 kN for the reference specimen, while the lowest is 26.2 kN for the specimen heated for 90 min and cooled with water, a 59.27% difference between them. Stiffness decreases as heating duration increases, with the reference section exhibiting significantly higher stiffness compared to the section heated for 90 min and cooled with water, with a 92.76% difference in stiffness. As heating duration increases, ductility also increases. Various failure modes are observed based on different heating and cooling conditions across different beam spans. This study provides insights into how GI-based CFS beams perform under temperature stress and different cooling scenarios, contributing valuable data for structural design and safety considerations in construction.

BuildingsVol. 14(8)
Karunya University (IN), Anna University, Chennai (IN), University of Waikato (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
7.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.