Decomposition of Differences in Distribution under Sample Selection and the Gender Wage Gap

I address the decomposition of the differences between the distribution of outcomes of two groups when individuals self-select themselves into participation. I differentiate between the decomposition for participants and the entire population, highlighting how the primitive components of the model affect each of the distributions of outcomes. Additionally, I introduce two ancillary decompositions that help uncover the sources of differences in the distribution of unobservables and participation between the two groups. The estimation is done using existing quantile regression methods, for which I show how to perform uniformly valid inference. I illustrate these methods by revisiting the gender wage gap, finding that changes in female participation and self-selection have been the main drivers for reducing the gap.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2024.2385823
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decomposition of Differences in Distribution under Sample Selection and the Gender Wage Gap

Santiago Pereda‐Fernández
1 citations
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
1.13
article

Decomposition of Differences in Distribution under Sample Selection and the Gender Wage Gap

Santiago Pereda‐Fernández
article en
1 citations

Abstract

I address the decomposition of the differences between the distribution of outcomes of two groups when individuals self-select themselves into participation. I differentiate between the decomposition for participants and the entire population, highlighting how the primitive components of the model affect each of the distributions of outcomes. Additionally, I introduce two ancillary decompositions that help uncover the sources of differences in the distribution of unobservables and participation between the two groups. The estimation is done using existing quantile regression methods, for which I show how to perform uniformly valid inference. I illustrate these methods by revisiting the gender wage gap, finding that changes in female participation and self-selection have been the main drivers for reducing the gap.

Journal of Business and Economic StatisticsVol. 43(2)
Universidad de Cantabria (ES), Economia (Czechia) (CZ)
International Association for Applied Econometrics, European Commission, Università di Bologna, Universidad de Cantabria, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Decent work and economic growth, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Decomposition of Differences in Distribution under Sample Selection and the Gender Wage Gap — Santiago Pereda‐Fernández · Journal of Business and Economic Statistics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS