Collecting Feature Models from the Literature: A Comprehensive Dataset for Benchmarking

Feature models are widely used for specifying the valid configurations of product lines. Many automated analyses on feature models have been considered, but they often depend on computationally complex algorithms (e.g., solving satisfiability problems). To identify and develop efficient reasoning engines, it is necessary to compare their performance on practically relevant feature models. However, empirical evaluations on feature-model analysis often suffer from the limitations of available feature-model datasets in terms of transferability. A major problem is the accessibility of relevant feature models as they are scattered over numerous publications. In this work, we perform a literature survey on empirical evaluations that target the performance of feature-model analyses to examine common evaluation practices and collect feature models for future evaluations. Furthermore, we examine the suitability of the derived collection for benchmarking performance. To improve accessibility, we provide a repository including all 2,518 identified feature models from 13 application domains, such as system software.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3646548.3672590
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collecting Feature Models from the Literature: A Comprehensive Dataset for Benchmarking

Thomas Thüm, Chico Sundermann, Tobias Heß, Elias Kuiter et al.
13 citations
Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
4.52
article

Collecting Feature Models from the Literature: A Comprehensive Dataset for Benchmarking

Thomas Thüm, Chico Sundermann, Tobias Heß, Elias Kuiter, Sebastian Krieter, Vincenzo F. Brancaccio
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Feature models are widely used for specifying the valid configurations of product lines. Many automated analyses on feature models have been considered, but they often depend on computationally complex algorithms (e.g., solving satisfiability problems). To identify and develop efficient reasoning engines, it is necessary to compare their performance on practically relevant feature models. However, empirical evaluations on feature-model analysis often suffer from the limitations of available feature-model datasets in terms of transferability. A major problem is the accessibility of relevant feature models as they are scattered over numerous publications. In this work, we perform a literature survey on empirical evaluations that target the performance of feature-model analyses to examine common evaluation practices and collect feature models for future evaluations. Furthermore, we examine the suitability of the derived collection for benchmarking performance. To improve accessibility, we provide a repository including all 2,518 identified feature models from 13 application domains, such as system software.

Universität Ulm (DE), Paderborn University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
4.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.