The British Political Tradition and Constitutional Policy: The Offer of Deliberative Mini Publics

Abstract The Review of the UK Constitution was an eighteen-month project assessing the functioning of the UK constitution resulting in a set of practical, innovative, and robust recommendations. This article draws out one theme from this research, the offer of Deliberative Mini Publics (DMPs) in the process of constitutional change in the UK. Using Marsh, Richards, and Smith’s ‘Asymmetric Power Model’ as a mechanism for understanding the centralised and top–down nature of British democracy, we argue that the integration of DMPs can offer an opportunity to mitigate some of the core problems with the functioning of the UK constitution and produce better constitutional policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Parliamentary Affairs
Published
2024-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsae022
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political Systems and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The British Political Tradition and Constitutional Policy: The Offer of Deliberative Mini Publics

Rebecca McKee, Jack Pannell, Steph Coulter, Jess Sargeant
1 citations
Parliamentary Affairs
Political Systems and Governance
2.23
article

The British Political Tradition and Constitutional Policy: The Offer of Deliberative Mini Publics

Rebecca McKee, Jack Pannell, Steph Coulter, Jess Sargeant
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Review of the UK Constitution was an eighteen-month project assessing the functioning of the UK constitution resulting in a set of practical, innovative, and robust recommendations. This article draws out one theme from this research, the offer of Deliberative Mini Publics (DMPs) in the process of constitutional change in the UK. Using Marsh, Richards, and Smith’s ‘Asymmetric Power Model’ as a mechanism for understanding the centralised and top–down nature of British democracy, we argue that the integration of DMPs can offer an opportunity to mitigate some of the core problems with the functioning of the UK constitution and produce better constitutional policy.

Parliamentary AffairsVol. 77(4)
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy (US), University of Cambridge (GB), Institute for Government (GB), Together (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Political Systems and Governance
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.