Decolonizing global AI governance: assessment of the state of decolonized AI governance in Sub-Saharan Africa

Global artificial intelligence (AI) governance must prioritize equity, embrace a decolonial mindset, and provide the Global South countries the authority to spearhead solution creation. Decolonization is crucial for dismantling Western-centric cognitive frameworks and mitigating biases. Integrating a decolonial approach to AI governance involves recognizing persistent colonial repercussions, leading to biases in AI solutions and disparities in AI access based on gender, race, geography, income and societal factors. This paradigm shift necessitates deliberate efforts to deconstruct imperial structures governing knowledge production, perpetuating global unequal resource access and biases. This research evaluates Sub-Saharan African progress in AI governance decolonization, focusing on indicators like AI governance institutions, national strategies, sovereignty prioritization, data protection regulations, and adherence to local data usage requirements. Results show limited progress, with only Rwanda notably responsive to decolonization among the ten countries evaluated; 80% are 'decolonization-aware', and one is 'decolonization-blind'. The paper provides a detailed analysis of each nation, offering recommendations for fostering decolonization, including stakeholder involvement, addressing inequalities, promoting ethical AI, supporting local innovation, building regional partnerships, capacity building, public awareness, and inclusive governance. This paper contributes to elucidating the challenges and opportunities associated with decolonization in SSA countries, thereby enriching the ongoing discourse on global AI governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.231994
Citations
45
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
23.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decolonizing global AI governance: assessment of the state of decolonized AI governance in Sub-Saharan Africa

Sylvain Landry Faye, Kokeb Dese, Gelan Ayana, Moise Ondua et al.
45 citations
Royal Society Open Science
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
23.67
article

Decolonizing global AI governance: assessment of the state of decolonized AI governance in Sub-Saharan Africa

Sylvain Landry Faye, Kokeb Dese, Gelan Ayana, Moise Ondua, Jude Dzevela Kong, Edmund I. Yamba, Dickson Shey Nsagha, Denis Nkweteyim, Kingsley Badu, Bontu Habtamu, Hundessa Daba Nemomssa, B. Mellado
article en
45 citations

Abstract

Global artificial intelligence (AI) governance must prioritize equity, embrace a decolonial mindset, and provide the Global South countries the authority to spearhead solution creation. Decolonization is crucial for dismantling Western-centric cognitive frameworks and mitigating biases. Integrating a decolonial approach to AI governance involves recognizing persistent colonial repercussions, leading to biases in AI solutions and disparities in AI access based on gender, race, geography, income and societal factors. This paradigm shift necessitates deliberate efforts to deconstruct imperial structures governing knowledge production, perpetuating global unequal resource access and biases. This research evaluates Sub-Saharan African progress in AI governance decolonization, focusing on indicators like AI governance institutions, national strategies, sovereignty prioritization, data protection regulations, and adherence to local data usage requirements. Results show limited progress, with only Rwanda notably responsive to decolonization among the ten countries evaluated; 80% are 'decolonization-aware', and one is 'decolonization-blind'. The paper provides a detailed analysis of each nation, offering recommendations for fostering decolonization, including stakeholder involvement, addressing inequalities, promoting ethical AI, supporting local innovation, building regional partnerships, capacity building, public awareness, and inclusive governance. This paper contributes to elucidating the challenges and opportunities associated with decolonization in SSA countries, thereby enriching the ongoing discourse on global AI governance.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 11(8)
Jimma University (ET), University of Buea (CM), University of Toronto (CA), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH), University of Ngaoundéré (CM), Cheikh Anta Diop University (SN)
International Development Research Centre, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
23.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.