Application of an in vitro new approach methodology to determine relative cancer potency factors of air pollutants based on whole mixtures

Air pollution is an example of a complex environmental mixture with different biological activities, making risk assessment challenging. Current cancer risk assessment strategies that focus on individual pollutants may overlook interactions among them, potentially underestimating health risks. Therefore, a shift towards the evaluation of whole mixtures is essential for accurate risk assessment. This study presents the application of an in vitro New Approach Methodology (NAM) to estimate relative cancer potency factors of whole mixtures, with a focus on organic pollutants associated with air particulate matter (PM). Using concentration-dependent activation of the DNA damage-signaling protein checkpoint kinase 1 (pChk1) as a readout, we compared two modeling approaches, the Hill equation and the benchmark dose (BMD) method, to derive Mixture Potency Factors (MPFs). MPFs were determined for five PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples covering sites with different land uses and our historical pChk1 data for PM<sub>10</sub> samples and Standard Reference Materials. Our results showed a concentration-dependent increase in pChk1 by all samples and a higher potency compared to the reference compound benzo[a]pyrene. The MPFs derived from the Hill equation ranged from 128 to 9793, while those from BMD modeling ranged from 70 to 303. Despite the differences in magnitude, a consistency in the relative order of potencies was observed. Notably, PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples from sites strongly impacted by biomass burning had the highest MPFs. Although discrepancies were observed between the two modeling approaches for whole mixture samples, relative potency factors for individual PAHs were more consistent. We conclude that differences in the shape of the concentration-response curves and how MPFs are derived explain the observed differences in model agreement for complex mixtures and individual PAHs. This research contributes to the advancement of predictive toxicology and highlights the feasibility of transitioning from assessing individual agents to whole mixture assessment for accurate cancer risk assessment and public health protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment International
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108942
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of an in vitro new approach methodology to determine relative cancer potency factors of air pollutants based on whole mixtures

Simone Andréa Pozza, Tetsushi Watanabe, Marcos Felipe de Oliveira Galvão, Poliany Cristiny de Oliveira Rodrigues et al.
4 citations
Environment International
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
1.14
article

Application of an in vitro new approach methodology to determine relative cancer potency factors of air pollutants based on whole mixtures

Simone Andréa Pozza, Tetsushi Watanabe, Marcos Felipe de Oliveira Galvão, Poliany Cristiny de Oliveira Rodrigues, Kristian Dreij, Antero Vieira Silva, Mattias Öberg, Ioannis Sadiktsis, Pérola de Castro Vasconcellos, Burcu Ünlü Endirlik, Caroline Scaramboni
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Air pollution is an example of a complex environmental mixture with different biological activities, making risk assessment challenging. Current cancer risk assessment strategies that focus on individual pollutants may overlook interactions among them, potentially underestimating health risks. Therefore, a shift towards the evaluation of whole mixtures is essential for accurate risk assessment. This study presents the application of an in vitro New Approach Methodology (NAM) to estimate relative cancer potency factors of whole mixtures, with a focus on organic pollutants associated with air particulate matter (PM). Using concentration-dependent activation of the DNA damage-signaling protein checkpoint kinase 1 (pChk1) as a readout, we compared two modeling approaches, the Hill equation and the benchmark dose (BMD) method, to derive Mixture Potency Factors (MPFs). MPFs were determined for five PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples covering sites with different land uses and our historical pChk1 data for PM<sub>10</sub> samples and Standard Reference Materials. Our results showed a concentration-dependent increase in pChk1 by all samples and a higher potency compared to the reference compound benzo[a]pyrene. The MPFs derived from the Hill equation ranged from 128 to 9793, while those from BMD modeling ranged from 70 to 303. Despite the differences in magnitude, a consistency in the relative order of potencies was observed. Notably, PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples from sites strongly impacted by biomass burning had the highest MPFs. Although discrepancies were observed between the two modeling approaches for whole mixture samples, relative potency factors for individual PAHs were more consistent. We conclude that differences in the shape of the concentration-response curves and how MPFs are derived explain the observed differences in model agreement for complex mixtures and individual PAHs. This research contributes to the advancement of predictive toxicology and highlights the feasibility of transitioning from assessing individual agents to whole mixture assessment for accurate cancer risk assessment and public health protection.

Environment InternationalVol. 190
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR), Stockholm University (SE), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Kyoto Pharmaceutical University (JP), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (BR), Erciyes University (TR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
1.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.