673 - Efficacy of nemolizumab in different subgroups of patients with prurigo nodularis in two randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials

Abstract Introduction It is unknown whether baseline demographics and disease characteristics have an influence on efficacy and safety of nemolizumab in adults with moderate-to-severe prurigo nodularis (PN). Objectives To report safety and efficacy of nemolizumab in the phase 3 studies (OLYMPIA-1 [NCT04501666]1 and OLYMPIA-2 [NCT04501679]2) for different subgroups. Materials & Methods Data were pooled from the pivotal studies in which adults with moderate-to-severe PN were randomized (2:1) to receive nemolizumab (initial 60mg subcutaneous dose, followed by 30mg/60mg [depending on a baseline weight: <90kg/≥90kg] every 4 weeks) or matching placebo. Results Comparisons in all subgroups (age, sex, race, weight, disease severity, atopy, prior treatment) identified efficacy of nemolizumab versus placebo consistent with the overall intention-to-treat population. At Week (W) 16, a ≥4-point improvement in weekly average Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale of nemolizumab vs. placebo was found in 18- to 65-year-old/>65-year-old: 58.6%/54.0% vs 20.0%/14.3%; males/females: 54.7%/59.2% vs 21.1%/17.1%; White/Black/Asian/Other race: 60.3%/56.5%/36.4%/40.0% vs 20.8%/11.8%/12.5%/0%, <90kg/≥90kg baseline weight: 55.6%/60.8% vs 17.9%/20.8%, baseline Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA] score of 3 [moderate]/4 [severe]: 54.9%/60.8% vs 23.6%/11.7%, with/without history of atopy: 53.8%/59.0% vs 20.3%/17.9% and with/without prior systemic treatment for PN: 57.9%/56.8% vs 14.4%/22.7%. An IGA success (score of 0/1 [clear/almost clear skin] with ≥2-point reduction from baseline) was found in 18- to 65-year-old/>65-year-old: 34.8%/24.0% vs 11.0%/2.4%; males/females: 28.0%/34.5% vs 10.5%/8.1%; White/Black/Asian/Other race: 32.2%/26.1%/33.3%/30.0% vs 8.1%/11.8%/18.8%/0%, <90kg/≥90kg baseline weight: 34.3%/27.2% vs 9.0%/9.4%, baseline IGA score of 3 [moderate]/4 [severe]: 34.0%/29.1% vs 12.7%/3.9%, with/without history of atopy: 29.9%/32.8% vs 4.7%/11.4% and with/without prior systemic treatment for PN: 37.2%/26.8% vs 8.9%/9.3%. Similar results were noted for sleep disturbance. No major difference was reported in the safety profile of nemolizumab between the subgroups. Conclusion Safety and efficacy of nemolizumab monotherapy in itch, skin lesions and sleep disturbance were consistent between the subgroups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae266.047
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

673 - Efficacy of nemolizumab in different subgroups of patients with prurigo nodularis in two randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials

Andrew Pink, Christophe Piketty, Gil Yosipovitch, Sonja Ständer et al.
British Journal of Dermatology
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

673 - Efficacy of nemolizumab in different subgroups of patients with prurigo nodularis in two randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials

Andrew Pink, Christophe Piketty, Gil Yosipovitch, Sonja Ständer, Rola Gharib, Aliene Noda, Martin Metz, Shawn G. Kwatra, Zarif K. Jabbar Lopez, Xiaoxiao Chen, Hema Sundaram
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction It is unknown whether baseline demographics and disease characteristics have an influence on efficacy and safety of nemolizumab in adults with moderate-to-severe prurigo nodularis (PN). Objectives To report safety and efficacy of nemolizumab in the phase 3 studies (OLYMPIA-1 [NCT04501666]1 and OLYMPIA-2 [NCT04501679]2) for different subgroups. Materials & Methods Data were pooled from the pivotal studies in which adults with moderate-to-severe PN were randomized (2:1) to receive nemolizumab (initial 60mg subcutaneous dose, followed by 30mg/60mg [depending on a baseline weight: <90kg/≥90kg] every 4 weeks) or matching placebo. Results Comparisons in all subgroups (age, sex, race, weight, disease severity, atopy, prior treatment) identified efficacy of nemolizumab versus placebo consistent with the overall intention-to-treat population. At Week (W) 16, a ≥4-point improvement in weekly average Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale of nemolizumab vs. placebo was found in 18- to 65-year-old/>65-year-old: 58.6%/54.0% vs 20.0%/14.3%; males/females: 54.7%/59.2% vs 21.1%/17.1%; White/Black/Asian/Other race: 60.3%/56.5%/36.4%/40.0% vs 20.8%/11.8%/12.5%/0%, <90kg/≥90kg baseline weight: 55.6%/60.8% vs 17.9%/20.8%, baseline Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA] score of 3 [moderate]/4 [severe]: 54.9%/60.8% vs 23.6%/11.7%, with/without history of atopy: 53.8%/59.0% vs 20.3%/17.9% and with/without prior systemic treatment for PN: 57.9%/56.8% vs 14.4%/22.7%. An IGA success (score of 0/1 [clear/almost clear skin] with ≥2-point reduction from baseline) was found in 18- to 65-year-old/>65-year-old: 34.8%/24.0% vs 11.0%/2.4%; males/females: 28.0%/34.5% vs 10.5%/8.1%; White/Black/Asian/Other race: 32.2%/26.1%/33.3%/30.0% vs 8.1%/11.8%/18.8%/0%, <90kg/≥90kg baseline weight: 34.3%/27.2% vs 9.0%/9.4%, baseline IGA score of 3 [moderate]/4 [severe]: 34.0%/29.1% vs 12.7%/3.9%, with/without history of atopy: 29.9%/32.8% vs 4.7%/11.4% and with/without prior systemic treatment for PN: 37.2%/26.8% vs 8.9%/9.3%. Similar results were noted for sleep disturbance. No major difference was reported in the safety profile of nemolizumab between the subgroups. Conclusion Safety and efficacy of nemolizumab monotherapy in itch, skin lesions and sleep disturbance were consistent between the subgroups.

British Journal of DermatologyVol. 191(Supplement_2)
West Virginia University (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Miami (US), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Manchester (GB), University Hospital Münster (DE), Cosmetic Laser Dermatology (US), Galderma (United States) (US), Galderma (Switzerland) (CH), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.