691 - Understanding patient and physician preferences when choosing between biologic and oral systemic treatment options for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a discrete choice experiment

Abstract Background A growing number of treatment options are becoming available for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), including biologic therapies. As these treatments have different efficacy, safety, and tolerability profiles, it is important to understand patient and physician preferences for informed treatment decision making. Objective To discover the importance of different attributes, including efficacy, safety, and mode of administration, and to provide insights into whether patient preferences concur or conflict with those of physicians. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional, online discrete choice experiment involving 306 patients with AD and 206 physicians in the UK and Germany. Qualitative interviews identified key attributes influencing treatment preferences, including efficacy (itch relief, sleep disturbance, time-to-itch relief, and total body surface area affected by eczema), safety (special warnings and risks of eye problems and shingles), and treatment administration. Data were analyzed using a random parameters logit model to calculate the conditional relative importance of each attribute. Results Both groups placed significant emphasis on efficacy, with reducing sleep disturbance ranking first for patients and second for physicians and itch ranking first for physicians and second for patients. Time to itch relief was the third most important efficacy attribute for both groups, although it was more important for patients. For both groups, the risk of eye problems was the most important safety concern. The mode of administration was not considered of great importance when compared with efficacy and safety attributes. Conclusions Our findings suggest patients prioritize sleep disturbance, an attribute not captured in other preference studies in AD, and itch. This emphasizes the importance of addressing sleep-related issues and itching to enhance patients’ well-being. The findings offer insights for prioritization strategies among healthcare providers, aiming to improve patient outcomes amidst a growing number of AD treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae266.065
Primary Topic
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

691 - Understanding patient and physician preferences when choosing between biologic and oral systemic treatment options for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a discrete choice experiment

Jonathan I. Silverberg, Jorge Puelles, Marco Boeri, Krystallia Pantiri et al.
British Journal of Dermatology
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
article

691 - Understanding patient and physician preferences when choosing between biologic and oral systemic treatment options for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a discrete choice experiment

Jonathan I. Silverberg, Jorge Puelles, Marco Boeri, Krystallia Pantiri, Nicholas Durno, Ben van Hout, Ramkumar Subramanian, Olivier Chambenoit, Pablo Arija, Katrin Jack
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background A growing number of treatment options are becoming available for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), including biologic therapies. As these treatments have different efficacy, safety, and tolerability profiles, it is important to understand patient and physician preferences for informed treatment decision making. Objective To discover the importance of different attributes, including efficacy, safety, and mode of administration, and to provide insights into whether patient preferences concur or conflict with those of physicians. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional, online discrete choice experiment involving 306 patients with AD and 206 physicians in the UK and Germany. Qualitative interviews identified key attributes influencing treatment preferences, including efficacy (itch relief, sleep disturbance, time-to-itch relief, and total body surface area affected by eczema), safety (special warnings and risks of eye problems and shingles), and treatment administration. Data were analyzed using a random parameters logit model to calculate the conditional relative importance of each attribute. Results Both groups placed significant emphasis on efficacy, with reducing sleep disturbance ranking first for patients and second for physicians and itch ranking first for physicians and second for patients. Time to itch relief was the third most important efficacy attribute for both groups, although it was more important for patients. For both groups, the risk of eye problems was the most important safety concern. The mode of administration was not considered of great importance when compared with efficacy and safety attributes. Conclusions Our findings suggest patients prioritize sleep disturbance, an attribute not captured in other preference studies in AD, and itch. This emphasizes the importance of addressing sleep-related issues and itching to enhance patients’ well-being. The findings offer insights for prioritization strategies among healthcare providers, aiming to improve patient outcomes amidst a growing number of AD treatments.

British Journal of DermatologyVol. 191(Supplement_2)
George Washington University (US), Galderma (United States) (US), Galderma (Switzerland) (CH), Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.